Search for: "Clemente v Ide"
Results 41 - 60
of 84
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2023, 2:38 pm
" Id. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 7:04 am
The picture will become clearer in 2011, when the agreement expires. [33] Sources 1 Len Pasquarelli, Players Wonder About the Free Part of Free Agency, ESPN, Apr. 6, 2007 available at [sports.espn.go.com] last visited Oct. 11, 2007 (hereinafter, Pasquarelli, Players Wonder). 2 Id. 3 Id. 4 Id. 5 Id. 6 Id. 7 Mike Tanier, Two Deep Zone: The First Franchise Player, FOOTBALL OUTSIDERS, Feb. 19, 2007 available at… [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 3:51 am
See, e.g., Clements v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:10 am
(Id., at subd. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am
” Id. at 219. [read post]
3 May 2016, 9:00 pm
& Alkermes Pharma Ireland Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 10:41 pm
See id. at *27. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 3:26 pm
The question this time, in Facebook v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
(Id.) [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 1:22 pm
See id at 360, 365; see also United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:26 pm
Id. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 4:26 am
Clement v Londa, 8 AD3d 89, 90 [1st Dept 2004); see Kai Lin v Department of Dentistry, Univ. of Rochester Med. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 1:28 pm
" (quoting Clement, 131 F.3d at 1468-69)); Haliczer v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:19 pm
” Id. at 1361 (citing N. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:41 am
Clement Stein, D2005-1201 (WIPO January 31, 2006) (Pending action in California state court) were dismissed at the Respondents’ requests. “No purpose is served by our rendering a decision on the merits to transfer the domain name, or have it remain, when as here, a decision regarding the domain name will have no practical consequence.” AmeriPlan Corp. id., v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:41 am
” AmeriPlan Corp. id., v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:41 am
Clement Stein, D2005-1201 (WIPO January 31, 2006) (Pending action in California state court) were dismissed at the Respondents’ requests. “No purpose is served by our rendering a decision on the merits to transfer the domain name, or have it remain, when as here, a decision regarding the domain name will have no practical consequence.” AmeriPlan Corp. id., v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:41 am
Clement Stein, D2005-1201 (WIPO January 31, 2006) (Pending action in California state court) were dismissed at the Respondents’ requests. “No purpose is served by our rendering a decision on the merits to transfer the domain name, or have it remain, when as here, a decision regarding the domain name will have no practical consequence.” AmeriPlan Corp. id., v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 10:47 am
” The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket summarizes a preview with Paul Clement on these same cases. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 7:36 pm
(Id.) [read post]