Search for: "Clemente v Ide" Results 41 - 60 of 84
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2007, 7:04 am
  The picture will become clearer in 2011, when the agreement expires. [33] Sources 1 Len Pasquarelli, Players Wonder About the Free Part of Free Agency, ESPN, Apr. 6, 2007 available at [sports.espn.go.com] last visited Oct. 11, 2007 (hereinafter, Pasquarelli, Players Wonder). 2 Id. 3 Id. 4 Id. 5 Id. 6 Id. 7 Mike Tanier, Two Deep Zone:  The First Franchise Player, FOOTBALL OUTSIDERS, Feb. 19, 2007 available at… [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 4:26 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Clement v Londa, 8 AD3d 89, 90 [1st Dept 2004); see Kai Lin v Department of Dentistry, Univ. of Rochester Med. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 1:28 pm
" (quoting Clement, 131 F.3d at 1468-69)); Haliczer v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:41 am by Gmlevine
Clement Stein, D2005-1201 (WIPO January 31, 2006) (Pending action in California state court) were dismissed at the Respondents’ requests. “No purpose is served by our rendering a decision on the merits to transfer the domain name, or have it remain, when as here, a decision regarding the domain name will have no practical consequence.” AmeriPlan Corp. id., v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:41 am by Gmlevine
Clement Stein, D2005-1201 (WIPO January 31, 2006) (Pending action in California state court) were dismissed at the Respondents’ requests. “No purpose is served by our rendering a decision on the merits to transfer the domain name, or have it remain, when as here, a decision regarding the domain name will have no practical consequence.” AmeriPlan Corp. id., v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:41 am by Gmlevine
Clement Stein, D2005-1201 (WIPO January 31, 2006) (Pending action in California state court) were dismissed at the Respondents’ requests. “No purpose is served by our rendering a decision on the merits to transfer the domain name, or have it remain, when as here, a decision regarding the domain name will have no practical consequence.” AmeriPlan Corp. id., v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 10:47 am by Andrew Hamm
” The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket summarizes a preview with Paul Clement on these same cases. [read post]