Search for: "Click v. Social Security Administration" Results 41 - 60 of 245
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of Bohack v DiNapoli, 197 AD3d 1384, the Appellate Division noted that Petitioner "bore the burden of establishing that his disability arose from an accident within the meaning of the Retirement and Social Security Law"* and Respondent's determination in this regard will be sustained "if supported by substantial evidence. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of Bohack v DiNapoli, 197 AD3d 1384, the Appellate Division noted that Petitioner "bore the burden of establishing that his disability arose from an accident within the meaning of the Retirement and Social Security Law"* and Respondent's determination in this regard will be sustained "if supported by substantial evidence. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
An administrative hearing officer concluded that the incidents giving rise to the City’s application did not constitute accidents within the meaning of the Retirement and Social Security Law [RSSL] and denied its application. [read post]
14 May 2007, 1:00 am
ONONDAGA COUNTYFamily Law Social Security Administration, Medi-Cal Finding Of Husband's Disability Not Binding on Court Matter of E.L. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Petitioner did not return to work and applied for disability retirement benefits pursuant to Retirement and Social Security Law §605. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Petitioner did not return to work and applied for disability retirement benefits pursuant to Retirement and Social Security Law §605. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 7:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Bodenmiller applied foraccidental disability retirement benefits but his application was administratively denied on on the ground that the incident as described by Bodenmiller did not constitute an accident within the meaning of the Retirement and Social Security Law. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 7:25 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of Kenny v DiNapoli, 11 NY3d 873, the Appellate Division observed that "[f]or purposes of the Retirement and Social Security Law, an accident is defined as "a sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary, and injurious in impact" and "an injury that results from the performance of ordinary employment duties and is a risk inherent in such job duties is not considered accidental. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 7:25 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of Kenny v DiNapoli, 11 NY3d 873, the Appellate Division observed that "[f]or purposes of the Retirement and Social Security Law, an accident is defined as "a sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary, and injurious in impact" and "an injury that results from the performance of ordinary employment duties and is a risk inherent in such job duties is not considered accidental. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 12:45 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITSocial ServicesAge Discrimination Act Inapplicable to Social Security Administration; No Error in Complaint's Dismissal Maloney, plaintiffs-appellants v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 1:08 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKSocial Services LawPlaintiffs Fail to Show Social Security Administration Violates Disability Assessments Encarnacion v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 6:12 am by Daniel E. Cummins
 The Plaintiffs in this matter were asserting that their medical expert should have been permitted to testify to records reviewed from the Social Security Administration Disability record and from a disability insurance carrier. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 3:19 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
In order to obtain lawful employment in the United States, foreign nationals are required to apply for an employment authorization card from USCIS, and a Social Security number with the Social Security Administration. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 1:24 am
Delaware River Port AuthorityCONSTITUTIONAL LAW - Privacy - Social Security Numbers"The Delaware River Port Authority is in violation of § 7 of the Privacy Act of 1974 by including the disclosure of one's Social Security number as a prerequisite for membership in its E-ZPass Senior Citizen Program. ' Marshak v. [read post]