Search for: "Cochrane v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 112
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am
” Heather Long for the Washington Post reports that Collins “said Sunday she would not vote for any judge who wanted to end access to abortion in the United States by overturning Roe v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 5:32 am
Cochran, 544 U.S. 734 (2005), the Supreme Court was set to consider the issue, but ended up not deciding it because the plaintiff died while the case was pending. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 5:06 pm
"A pardon is an act of grace," wrote John Marshall in United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am
John's University School of LawKatherine Schostok, DePaul University College of LawAllison Winnike, University of Houston Law Center 5:00 – 7:00 PM Welcome Reception – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law Friday, June 9, 20177:30 – 8:15 AM Registration & Breakfast – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law 8:15 – 8:30 AM Opening Remarks – Ceremonial Courtroom, Georgia State LawWendy Hensel, Interim Dean and Professor of Law, Georgia… [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 7:26 pm
#1 Cochran, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 4:10 am
Texas, No. 15-797, the United States Supreme Court will consider whether the Court of Criminal Appeals, Texas’ highest court for criminal matters, went astray last year in upholding the death sentence of Bobby J. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:40 am
United State v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
March 14, 2016), the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit made an inexplicably horrible decision relating to a photographer's copyright in an image used in sex trafficking. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
March 14, 2016), the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit made an inexplicably horrible decision relating to a photographer's copyright in an image used in sex trafficking. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
March 14, 2016), the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit made an inexplicably horrible decision relating to a photographer's copyright in an image used in sex trafficking. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 9:05 pm
[Ira Stoll, more] “Returning to Common-Law Principles of Insider Trading After United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:08 pm
We have had nearly 700,000 page views this year, more than half from the UK with the United States, Australia, Hong Kong and Ireland making up the rest of the top five. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 11:36 am
United States, 509 U.S. 544 (1993). [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:40 am
S., at 606–607 (quoting United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:14 am
It is said that the law cannot keep pace with society, evolving about twenty years slower than the culture, but even the United States Supreme Court has caught on to the uniqueness of the modern “cell phone,” calling the devices “minicomputers that also happen to have the capacity to be used as a telephone” in a landmark case last year called Riley v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 2:03 pm
’s explanation for the coding of Wisconsin v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 2:48 am
– Kirsten Sjøvoll Facebook’s Community Standards: Severed heads are okay, but nipples are bad (unless accompanied by a baby) – Gideon Benaim and Jon Oakley United States: Facebook, Cyberbullying and the First Amendment – Susan Brenner So, welcome back to our readers. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 7:53 pm
If a drug company, in 1995, marketed antenatal corticosteroid (ACS) for the prevention of cerebral palsy (CP) in the United States, the government might well have prosecuted the company for misbranding. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 6:06 pm
Goodman v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 7:32 am
Kneeland, 37 Mass. (20 Pick.) 206 (1838); State v. [read post]
