Search for: "Collins V. State of Maine" Results 41 - 60 of 193
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2012, 11:21 am by David Kopel
Since the 2003 CCA, non-interference with licensed carry has been the practices at the campuses of Colorado State University (whose main campus is in Fort Collins). [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:50 am by Kathryn Noble, Olswang
Supreme Court The main issue for the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Collins, Clarke and Dyson) to decide was whether the First and Second Complaints were based on the same grounds, such that the general principle that the same cause should not be brought against somebody twice (nemo debet bis vexari pro una et eadem causa) was engaged. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:59 am by Andrew Hamm
Susan Collins of Maine, speaking last year about the filibuster, beseeched Democratic Sen. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 1:39 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
But this is not the main answer that Lord Collins gave. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
”  More.Kathleen Ayers, a recently retired register of probate got Kennebec County, will lead the workshop "Maine's County Probate Courts," sponsored by the Greater Portland Chapter of the Maine Genealogical Society, on Saturday, March 2, at 1 p.m. and held online. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 2:32 pm by Clerquette LeClerq
Collins, for example, describes one of her first oral arguments, in United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:04 am by Vipul Kapoor, Olswang LLP
The two main questions in deciding whose interest had priority, and the questions to be considered by the Supreme Court, are: whether NEPB had been in a position, at the exchange of contracts, to confer equitable proprietary rights on Mrs Scott, as opposed to personal rights only; and if equitable rights were conferred, whether the decision of the House of Lords in Abbey National Building Society v Cann [1991] is to be applied. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:45 pm by INFORRM
On 28 October 2021 Collins Rice J heard an application to commit in the case of GUH v KYT, judgment was reserved. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:57 pm
 The main judgments were given by Lord Neuberger and Lord Hope, which whom the others agreed. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am by Ronald Collins
Question: Based on your extensive research, do you think that Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong’s major take-away points (beyond United States v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:30 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
Anticipation and obviousness Turning next to validity, MI’s main attack was on anticipation and/or lack of inventive step over the prior art “Collins” alone, or together with the prior art “Kern”, a citation in Collins. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm by NL
Lord Hope's main judgment, with which Lady Hale and Lord Brown agreed, traced the history of cases before and after Runa Begum. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm by NL
Lord Hope's main judgment, with which Lady Hale and Lord Brown agreed, traced the history of cases before and after Runa Begum. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 7:08 am by Ronald Collins
(Interested readers can also listen to your discussion of the book on a recent episode of the CleanLaw podcast.) * * * Question: How would you describe the arc of your book, and who is the main intended audience? [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:10 pm
The Plaintiff's vehicle was struck by a car driven by Collin Ward Crane, who died as a result of injuries he sustained in the accident (herein after referred to as `Decedent’). [read post]