Search for: "Com. v. Cross" Results 41 - 60 of 322
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2011, 5:09 am by Russ Bensing
In rejecting the claim, the 8th relied almost solely upon State v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 11:44 am
Four years after Crawford v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
”  There are plenty of cases saying that telling defendant he has right to cross-examine witnesses is sufficient to inform him of his right to confrontation , and now  the 8th District adds one more… All in the family:  in State v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 3:54 am by Russ Bensing
If the cross-examiner is merely inquiring whether something is or is not true, a good faith basis is not required. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 3:54 am by Russ Bensing
  It was in the case of Virginia v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 3:31 am by Russ Bensing
You’re representing a defendant in a domestic violence case, and comes time to cross-examine the alleged victim, you’re loaded for bear. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 3:31 am
  This past year, the Court ruled in Herring v. [read post]
IAC
26 May 2011, 4:17 am by Russ Bensing
Take State v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 3:30 am
After the Supreme Court’s 2006 decision in State v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
Cross, in which the Court stressed again the “highly obsequious deferential standard” Federal courts are to use in weighing state court decisions. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:47 am by Russ Bensing
An even bigger case, potentially, is McDonald v. [read post]