Search for: "Couch v. Couch"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,042
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2015, 9:05 pm
Perez v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 12:24 pm
A search of which revealed "a shoe box on top of the living room couch containing approximately a kilogram of cocaine, another shoe box containing another kilogram of cocaine and some $29,000 in cash behind the drugs. . . . . [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm
Couch v Attorney-General (No 2) (2010): The Susan Couch LitigationStephen Todd (University of Canterbury, UK)15. [read post]
1 May 2008, 1:43 am
Recently I came across the judgment of Floyd J in Kapur v Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2008] All ER (D) 142. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 10:40 am
We must use time as a tool, not as a couch. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 6:25 am
Apparently, where there’s smoke, there ain’t necessarily a viable negligence case.For a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Graham v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 8:49 am
Petitioner was required to converse with patrons and perform both pole and couch dances. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 2:10 pm
On September 27, 2010, the Ninth Circuit reversed a district court order denying certification of a Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (“FACTA”) claim in Bateman v. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 2:11 pm
According to Oregon v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:11 pm
According to Oregon v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 9:36 am
Not the couch. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 2:16 pm
Late last month, the First District Appellate Court decided Caburnay v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 3:04 pm
See also United States v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:35 am
Co. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 9:56 am
By Eric Goldman Taylor v. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 5:05 pm
If so, do you couch your objection in policy or fairness terms, hoping that the court will simply decide to depart from the current state of the law? [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 9:26 am
"No other circuit allows entry into the home on less than reasonable suspicion," writes 9th Circuit Chief Judge Alex Kozinski, in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Although the CBA provided that the employee "may serve a written demand on the Mayor for a hearing and further evaluation of the application," was couched in permissive rather than mandatory terms, Petitioner was not excused from exhausting the administrative remedies available to him.4. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 3:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
