Search for: "Coughlin v. Coughlin" Results 41 - 60 of 209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2008, 9:24 pm
  (I clarify in comment two below that my criticism is directed to the naming of Messrs Park and Coughlin; I do not question Torkelson's general statement about the firm's knowledge.) [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 12:26 pm by Austin Mehr
See Minneapolis Firefighters’ Relief Ass’n v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
”** Law enforcement personnel including correction officers are public officers subject to the provisions of Public Officers Law §30(1)(e) [see Graham v Coughlin, 72 NY2d 1014].The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_03535.htm [read post]
7 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
”** Law enforcement personnel including correction officers are public officers subject to the provisions of Public Officers Law §30(1)(e) [see Graham v Coughlin, 72 NY2d 1014].The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_03535.htm [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 10:07 pm by Walter Olson
More: ABA Journal; City of Livonia Employees Retirement System v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
In Rychlick v Coughlin, 63 NY2d 643, a case challenging an appointing authority's demand that an employee resign from the position or be served with  disciplinary charges, the Court of Appeals ruled that threatening to do what the appointing authority had a right to do -- file disciplinary charges against the employee -- did not constitute coercion so as to make the resignation involuntary.New York’s Court of Appeals has also addressed the question of using an… [read post]
20 May 2013, 4:41 am
" In contrast, the Appellate Division, citing Rychlick v Coughlin, 99 AD2d 863, affd. 63 NY2d 643, explained that "it has consistently been held that a threat to do that which one has the legal right to do does not constitute duress. [read post]
12 May 2022, 10:17 am by Unknown
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2022.html In re Coughlin (Tribal Sovereign Immunity) Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:36 am
Using tape-recorded testimony in an administrative proceedingMiller v Howard Safir, App. [read post]