Search for: "Counts v. International Paper Co." Results 41 - 60 of 168
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2020, 4:14 pm by Bona Law PC
Indeed, this is consistent with the DOJ past best practices, where it rarely used DPAs to resolve criminal antitrust violations: In May 2015, five international banks plead guilty of conspiracy to manipulate the price of U.S. dollars and Euros exchanged in the foreign currency exchange spot market. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 2:05 pm by SCOTUStalk
Deanne Maynard, co-chair of Morrison & Foerster’s Appellate and Supreme Court practice, has argued 14 cases before the Supreme Court since her first oral argument in 2004. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 11:30 pm by Schachtman
Meta-analysis has been around for decades, and reporting meta-analyses of observational or of experimental studies has been the subject of numerous consensus and standard-setting papers over the last two decades. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 6:27 am by Adam Feldman
Seven of Cato’s and CAC’s cites came from their co-authored brief in Gamble. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
An inquiry by the Parker Commission found the following year that he had violated conflict of interest rules on fourteen counts. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 6:46 am by Florian Mueller
" (emphasis added)The market-driven and reality-centric solution to the problems I just outlined would be exactly what the FTC proposed in its opening statement in the FTC v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am by Barry Sookman
It started with this quote from Bill Gates, Microsoft’s co-founder: It’s always surprising how old concepts carry into the new medium. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am by Schachtman
  Selikoff served as an intern, at the Beth Israel Hospital, in Newark, New Jersey.17 1944 – 1946. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm by Joel R. Brandes
July 1, 2018Appellate Division, First DepartmentFirst Department Holds Brooke’s Reasoning Applies with Equal Force Where Child Is Legally Adopted by One Partner and Other Partner Claims He or She Is A AParent@With Co‑Equal Rights Because Of Preadoption Agreement. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm by Joel R. Brandes
July 1, 2018Appellate Division, First DepartmentFirst Department Holds Brooke’s Reasoning Applies with Equal Force Where Child Is Legally Adopted by One Partner and Other Partner Claims He or She Is A AParent@With Co‑Equal Rights Because Of Preadoption Agreement. [read post]