Search for: "Cox v. USA"
Results 41 - 60
of 68
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
In Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
In Obsidian Finance v Cox (23 August 2011), the court ruled in favour of blogger Crystal Cox, who ran the website obsidianfinancesucks.com, where she published a number of serious and damaging statements about a bankruptcy trustee. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm
Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelly USA, Inc. (2005) 129 Cal.App.4th 1228, 1250. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:44 pm
Cox (Southern District of Ohio; decided September 20, 2011). [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 6:00 pm
(Ars Technica) Battle between software patents and open source (IP Watchdog) US Patents – Decisions District Court E D Texas: Jury finds in favour of Limelight on ongoing battle with Level 3 Communication over patents covering internet content delivery network technology (Law360) USPTO overturns patent for virtual subdomains filed by Ideaflood (Ars Technica) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Bilski - Bilski petitions the Supreme Court to decide… [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
Cox Inc., just to name two examples. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 1:29 pm
She cites ElliottEstate v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46) Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am
The full list of resolved complaints from last week: Mr Peter Reynolds v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 1, 20/04/2012; Samaritans, Mind, Rethink Mental Illness, Sane and PAPYRUS Prevention of Young Suicide v The Sun, Clause 5, 19/04/2012; Mr Adam Stephens v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; Mr Peter Reynolds v Harborough Mail, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; Mrs Drene Brown v Scunthorpe Telegraph, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; A woman v Hastings and St Leonards… [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:06 am
The cohort was followed for a median of 6.6 years, in which time there were 154 cases of ovarian cancer, available for analysis using Cox’s proportional hazards model. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 1:46 pm
The case is U.S. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 1:46 pm
The case is U.S. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
Trial2006-03-27 Judd v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
Trial2006-03-27 Judd v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 12:12 pm
See, e.g., Cox v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 5:09 am
Víctor A. [read post]
7 May 2008, 4:39 pm
National Pride at Work v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:45 am
Father Brian Cox 24. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:33 am
(Cox Communications and Aruba have made similar requests i [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 9:58 pm
Accordingly, Coix filed the Coix Health, LLC v. [read post]
