Search for: "Cross v. Hall County"
Results 41 - 60
of 120
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2018, 1:00 pm
Supreme Court granted cert in Timbs v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 8:00 am
Montgomery v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:16 am
Second, the Court found trial counsel’s performance deficient because during cross examination of the detective, trial counsel asked the detective if he had been provided an opportunity to interrogate Tran. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
There's one additional fact, and since it came out in the direct and cross of my clients—we rested our case. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:00 am
Shirley Malcolm v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 5:02 pm
These were the issues discussed by the Appellate Division, Second Department, in its April 5, 2017 decision in Hall v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
See Hall v. [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 12:53 pm
Hall, States’ Decisions Not to Expand Medicaid, 92 N.C. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:29 am
Hardin County, Kentucky that a county’s right-to-work ordinance was "state law" for purposes of the exception from preemption by Congress under NLRA Section 14(b). [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 11:37 pm
Hall, 20 S.W.3d 403, 406 (Tex. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 7:37 am
(Campbell v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 7:05 am
Lewis v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
Montgomery v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 9:05 pm
Prior to trial, in an order dated August 26, 2004, the Supreme Court determined that the County was collaterally estopped from arguing that the road was not negligently designed based upon prior decisions of this Court in Furino v County of Nassau and Zawacki v County of Nassau. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 9:18 am
” Brown v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 9:18 am
” Brown v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 4:54 pm
Real Estate Group v. [read post]
Case Comment: R (ZH and CN) v London Borough of Newham and London Borough of Lewisham [2014] UKSC 62
14 May 2015, 1:59 am
In Hounslow LBC v Powell; Leeds CC v Hall; Birmingham CC v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8; [2011] 2 AC 18; [2011] HLR 23, the decision in Pinnock was held to be of general application whenever a public authority seek possession of a property that constitutes a person’s home. [read post]
13 May 2015, 8:35 am
Marshall v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 4:03 am
Furthermore, ‘by allowing the debate about the Constitution and the Euro to be viewed as an extension of domestic party politics it understates the cross-party and non-party divide on these issues. [read post]
