Search for: "Curtin v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 84
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Andrew Hudson
  We have previously written at length on decisions of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT), or State or Federal Courts on the classification of goods for customs purposes. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am by INFORRM
An Acoba spokesperson explained “the Ministerial Code states that ministers must ensure that no new appointments are announced, or taken up, before the committee has been able to provide its advice. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 11:27 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
Perry intercalates abundant (and delightful) quotations from 18th century cases with his own discussion as he makes valuable points concerning the current debate on copyright rationale and scope.Part V “The lore of courts”Shubha Ghosh, in Chapter 10, “‘If Music Did Not Pay’: The State Court Roots of Justice Holmes’ Intellectual Property Jurisprudence”, considers IP decisions by Justice Holmes, when he was still serving on the Massachusetts… [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:32 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Curtin: note that the capacity to marry is lower threshold. [read post]
28 Oct 2024, 3:23 am by Joseph Williams (US)
Cuban, 620 F.3d 551 (5th Cir. 2010) (“Cuban II”) (stating elements of misappropriation with respect to the securities laws); SEC v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am by INFORRM
On the same day Nicklin J heard an application to commit in the case of MBR Acres v Curtin. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:12 am by INFORRM
On 10 November 2022 there was a hearing in the case of MBR Acres Ltd v Curtin. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 10:09 am by Susanna Villani (University of Bologna)
As for the notion of ‘territory’, it was recalled that it may include geographical areas which, although under the jurisdiction or responsibility of a different State, have a separate and distinct status under international law (Court of Justice, Council v. [read post]
3 Oct 2006, 2:01 pm
Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc., 494 U.S. 775, 786 (1990). [read post]
Finally, in concluding his analysis of the constitutionality of the relevant chapter of the Act, MacMenamin J referred to Demir v. [read post]
It covers all types of imports and exports of products.[2] Any national measure enacted by Member States which has the effect of hindering, directly or indirectly, actually or potentially, trade in the internal market is to be considered as having an effect equivalent to quantitative restrictions.[3] The Court of Justice of the European Union [“CJEU”] has explained that national measures subjecting the internal trade of goods to prior authorization restrict access to the market… [read post]
For an outline of the proposition, see the State of California’s voter website. [read post]