Search for: "D. et al v. United Healthcare et al" Results 41 - 60 of 133
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2016, 12:54 pm by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Second Chance Body Armor, et al., No. 04-0280 (D.D.C.), setting forth the DOJ’s official position on the impact of the Supreme Court’s unanimous decision announced last week in Universal Health Services, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
| Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
See also Manual at 614 n. 198., citing Ofer Shpilberg, et al., The Next Stage: Molecular Epidemiology, 50 J. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:38 pm by Schachtman
Baxter Healthcare challenged the classification, and according to Greenland, the defense experts erroneously interpreted inclusive studies with evidence supporting a conclusion that DEHP does not cause cancer. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm by Schachtman
Baxter Healthcare challenged the classification, and according to Greenland, the defense experts erroneously interpreted inclusive studies with evidence supporting a conclusion that DEHP does not cause cancer. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 2:23 am
Wyndham Worldwide Corp., et al., Defendants, Civil Action No. 13-1887 (ES), United States District Court, D. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 2:23 am
Wyndham Worldwide Corp., et al., Defendants, Civil Action No. 13-1887 (ES), United States District Court, D. [read post]