Search for: "DAVID HECKLER" Results 41 - 60 of 75
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2008, 4:00 pm
Coates Case Number: 2:2008cv00201 HECKLER & KOCH, INC. v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 7:01 pm
The Browning Double Action (14 rounds) entered the market the next year, and less famous companies, such as Germany’s Heckler & Koch, also jumped in. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:29 am by Jon Hyman
Here’s a post about the sweetness of revenge, A pro golfer gets his revenge on Twitter; causes a heckler to lose his job, via (our ever-gracious proprietor) Eric Meyer and his Employer Handbook blog. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:54 am by David Oscar Markus
  David Lat covers the latest debacle at Stanford Law School here, involving the Federalist Society, 5th Circuit Judge Duncan, and a bunch of protestors. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 4:02 am by SHG
As David French argues, the lesson here “undermines the very profession they seek to join. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Wouldn’t allowing a school to punish the speaker under those circumstances amount to a problematic heckler’s veto? [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 7:16 am by INFORRM
Despite having engaged a young David Pannick to argue the case on his behalf, Alastair Brett was unsuccessful at first instance and in the Court of Appeal. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 3:17 pm
As has been repeatedly held, “yielding to a ‘heckler’s veto’ infringes a speaker’s free speech. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 5:17 pm by Josh Blackman
But at least at CUNY, circa 2018, the administration could still be distinguished from the hecklers. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:28 am by Evelyn Douek
As Kaye says, in a comment seemingly aimed at those concerned that international human rights law will be insufficiently protective of free speech, “[T]here is no ‘heckler’s veto’ in international human rights law. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 11:32 am by Stuart N. Brotman
Loudly voiced opposition from protesters was a classic “heckler’s veto” (first coined by the late University of Chicago Law Professor Harry Kalven) – silencing a speaker whom they disagreed with by shouting him down – hoping that this would be enough to have Judge Duncan walk away. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 1:57 pm by Eugene Volokh
” In essence, then, the heckler’s veto seems to have successfully censored speech on campus in this instance, as security threats preempted protected expression. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 5:14 am by INFORRM
  This should not be a “heckler’s veto” – in English law there is a “reasonableness” test. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
In a development reminiscent of the movie Groundhog Day, the insidious movement to permit religious believers to avoid the laws that govern everyone else has reached a new and truly disturbing level. [read post]