Search for: "DEF Corp." Results 41 - 60 of 181
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2018, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
Yesterday, Corp Fin updated 4 CDIs to address the implications of the SEC’s adoption of rule amendments increasing the number of “smaller reporting companies” (SRCs) eligible to provide scaled disclosure. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 6:21 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Golden's claims, or in the alternative, to dismiss this case (the "Motion to Compel Arbitration"), and filed a memorandum of law in support (the "Def's Mem. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
[FN1]Defendant responds that he has provided full disclosure but, in any event, is willing to supplement that disclosure (Def Aff ¶¶ 11-12, citing Def Exh F). [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 3:07 am by Liz Dunshee
Corp Fin has begun to formulate recommendations to the Commission for possible additional changes to the “accelerated filer” definition that, if adopted, would have the effect of reducing the number of companies that qualify as accelerated filers (and are subject to auditor attestation requirements). [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
Curtiss-Wright Export Corp (1936); Fong Yue Ting v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 8:59 am by Eugene Volokh
I blogged two weeks ago about the latest twist in the Barley House YouTube video case. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am by Wolfgang Demino
Hastings Law Journal has a new article (technically a "Note") on predatory lending and the implications of  Madden v Midland, written by a recent graduate. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am by Wolfgang Demino
Hastings Law Journal has a new article (technically a "Note") on predatory lending and the implications of the Second Circuit's holding on federal (non)preemption of state usury laws in Saliha Madden v Midland Funding LLC et al, written by a recent graduate. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm by Wolfgang Demino
CAVEAT FOR READERS IN TEXAS: This action by targets of National Collegiate Student Loan collection suits was filed in a different state and in a different circuit, and involves state law claim in addition to federal FDCPA claims, and unfair collection claims under the FDCPA heavily implicated state law which varies among states. [read post]