Search for: "Dates v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 30,115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2024, 4:26 am
Schecter, as recently affirmed by the First Department: “[T]he signed, amended, and restated limited partnership agreement that is dated as of October 1 of 2016 [] does utterly refute the claims that are in this complaint in every regard. [read post]
19 May 2024, 12:40 pm
Oil States Energy Servs., LLC v. [read post]
18 May 2024, 7:41 am
Mular v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:29 pm
BrazilBig Pan Bakery v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:31 am
Susan V. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am
This is nicely illustrated by three decisions, one from the Helsinki local division in AIM Sport v Supponor (UPC CFI_214/2023), one from the Munich Local Division in 10x Genomics v NanoString (UPC CFI_17/2023) and a recent decision of the Paris Central Division in Nokia v Mala Technologies, (UPC_CFI_484/2023). [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am
From Brexit to The Hague (2016-2024) When the former Prime Minister and current Foreign Secretary David Cameron set the date for the EU referendum on 23 June 2016, this was widely regarded as just a political move to ensure support for the outcome of his renegotiations of the terms of continued membership in the European Union.[4] However, as the referendum results showed 51.9% of voters were actually in favour of leaving,[5] it became apparent that Downing Street had significantly… [read post]
17 May 2024, 3:00 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 1:24 pm
The United States Department of Labor (DOL) is charged with enforcing the requirements of ERISA. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm
Broderick on August 28.[42] Most recently, in an order filed by United States Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on February 12, 2024, the Court addressed a pending privilege dispute over which state’s law should apply to resolve the documents.[43] Another issue was whether the attorney-client privilege between the Estate and its counsel exten [read post]
16 May 2024, 5:00 am
This approach is preferred because, as illustrated in the case of POC v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:57 am
Earlier this year, the Fourth Circuit decided United States v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:00 am
" Viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff as the nonmovant (see Vega v Restani Constr. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:00 am
" Viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff as the nonmovant (see Vega v Restani Constr. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
The infringing activity, Nealy claimed, dated back to 2008—so ten years before he brought suit. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:15 am
State and Local Preemption. [read post]
Blog Post: Practical Guidance Offers Help with Workplace Issues during Mental Health Awareness Month
13 May 2024, 10:00 pm
See Bradford v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 8:39 am
Knaub’s parents acquired the real estate at some unknown date for $33,000. [read post]
