Search for: "Davis v. National Broadcasting Company"
Results 41 - 60
of 62
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm
However, in a letter to the Minister the company rejected the minister’s concerns about media plurality and broadcasting standards, saying that she had based her view on “seriously flawed” evidence. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm
On 3 March 2017 the Court of Appeal (Lewison, Lloyd-Jones and McCombe LJJ) gave judgment in the important data protection case of Ittihadieh v 5-11 Cheyne Gardens RTM Company Ltd & Ors [2017] EWCA Civ 121. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm
A yachting company has filed libel proceedings against the editor of an o [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 4:19 pm
The National Law Review has produced an Infographic with facts about social media in 2016. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 11:54 pm
Howard Platnick likely misrepresented the views of specialists so it was easier for an insurance company to deny a victim benefits after the accident. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 4:08 pm
” The High Court of Ireland has refused to order the disclosure of documents RTÉ, the national public service broadcaster of Ireland, who says it needs to defend a defamation case brought by Senator David Norris. [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm
Last week in the Courts On 14 July 2016, Nicola Davies J ordered the hearing of a preliminary issue in the case of Baxmann v Etok. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 4:09 pm
The Relationships between Speech and Conduct, UC Davis Law Review, Vol. 49, 2016, Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 16-16, Jane R. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
See “Medical Horizons,” Broadcasting * Telecasting at 14 (Nov. 21, 1955) (describing Selikoff as a plodding presenter). [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:07 am
After a tough selection process, Eleonora announces the winner.* Broadcast Monitoring Service is (Partly) Fair Use for New York JudgeIn Fox News Network, LLC v TVEyes Inc., No. 1:13-cv-05315, Fox News sued TVEyes, a US company that monitors and records “all content broadcast by more than 1,400 television and radio stations twenty-four hours per day, seven days per week, and transforms the content into a searchable database for its subscribers”,… [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
Davis v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:53 am
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Woodrow v Johansson, heard 19 January 2012 (HHJ Parkes QC) Miller v Associated Newspapers heard 21 to 25 May 2012 (Sharp J) SKA v CRH, heard 10 and 11 July 2012 (Nicola Davies J) Lord Ashcroft v Foley heard 20 July 2012 (Eady J) [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:18 am
This time, however, the party division was more overt, with committee members Tom Watson MP and Louise Mensch MP loudly disputing the Murdoch line on Twitter and in the national media. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am
As a result, the magazine’s parent company, IPC no longer considered him for the editorship. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:59 am
Nolan to Go Out On Limb In Kleen Products Predictive Coding Case - bit.ly/HGgMfD (Matthew Nelson) Proportionality Demystified: How Organizations Can Get eDiscovery Right by Following Four Key Principles – http://bit.ly/IUFds3 (Philip Favro) Redefine Transparency in Predictive Coding: Shoot for Validity - bit.ly/HL7PhL (Gerard Britton) Robinson v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm
The following day Lord Neuberger MR dismissed the claimant’s application for permission to appeal and the programme was subsequently broadcast. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:23 am
The information appeared in reports in national newspapers including The Sun and Daily Mirror. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:58 am
Thus, any commercial we broadcast may be challenged. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 4:51 pm
Having spent a small amount of time in school studying sports marketing, I've always found ambush marketing—a tactic where a company tip-toes around copyright infringement—to be interesting. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
New Massachusetts companies. [read post]
