Search for: "Davis v. Parke, Davis & Company" Results 41 - 60 of 194
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
LOPEZ; from Midland County; 11th district (11-06-00086-CV, 229 SW3d 775, 05-17-07)07-0735 TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:58 am
  Warner-Lambert had itself acquired in 1970 Parke-Davis, which had conducted research into pregabalin and a related compound gabapentin. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 5:10 am
The court also held that a damage claim under the NY Corrections Law had to be brought in the state court of claims.In Davis v. [read post]
10 Oct 2024, 2:05 pm by John Elwood
In dissent, Judge Stephen Menashi wrote that “the Constitution contains no Fake Park Exception to the public use requirement of the Takings Clause,” and that a park does not satisfy the public-use requirement when its actual purpose and but-for cause is stopping lawful activity. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:02 pm by Blog Editorial
Consolidated Contractors International Company SAL v Munib Masri, heard 26 May 2011. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 11:54 pm by INFORRM
Howard Platnick likely misrepresented the views of specialists so it was easier for an insurance company to deny a victim benefits after the accident. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:44 am by Blog Editorial
Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly and Company, heard 18 – 20 July 2011. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Hold the Front page has a piece entitled “IPSO and the use of social media as a source” Statements in Open Court As already mentioned, on 1 February 2017, there was a statement in open court in the case of Finsbury Park Mosque v Thomson Reuters. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 2:37 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Lawrence Davis and an entity controlled by the Sapir Group's attorney in connection with the Project, Robert J. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 29 November 2019 Davis LJ and Warby J handed down the reserved judgment in the case of R (Liberal Democrats) v ITV Broadcasting Ltd [2019] EWHC 3282 (Admin), giving the full reasons for the dismissal of the application for judicial review. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:55 am by INFORRM
The family of murdered teenager Bianca Davies is to sue New York officals over video footage. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 12:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Perhaps unsurprisingly, a federal court sent his hostile work environment claim under Title VII to trial (Davis v. [read post]
4 Feb 2025, 8:39 am by Tobin Admin
Judge Davis explained that the reason for the general rule of non-liability in O.C.G.A. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 10:43 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The style of the case is, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments Harrison v Cameron, heard 26 March 2024 (Steyn J) BW Legal Services Limited v Trustpilot,  heard 7 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Unity Plus Healthcare Limited v Clay and others,  heard 1 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Parsons v Atkinson, heard 26 and 27 February 2024 (Farbey J) Vince v Associated Newspapers, heard 19 February 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini v Dow Jones, heard 13 December 2023 (HHJ Parkes KC) Wilson… [read post]