Search for: "Davis v. Superior Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 408
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2016, 10:29 am
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Wearry v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 10:41 am
Superior Court (Cal. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 7:25 am
In Davis-Lynch Holding Co., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 4:18 am
Supreme Court, in McIntyre v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 11:17 am
The case is Davis v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:54 am
Why was the Harvard plan (that used “pluses”) constitutionally superior to UC Davis’s (which used a quota to admit medical students)? [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 7:16 am
Supreme Court case Packard Motor Car Co. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Superior Court (Galfano), no. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 2:03 pm
Contract Law Contract Drafting California Law APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Timothy B. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 3:20 pm
See Davis v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 6:02 pm
Pursuant to the Supreme Court's recent decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 9:16 pm
Ontario Superior Court of Justice. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 3:29 am
Superior Court, Tyrrell v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
” I am happy to report that the most significant post-Rucho ruling by a state court has done just that.On September 3, a three-judge state North Carolina Superior Court panel ruled, in Common Cause v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:15 am
Superior Court, 95 Cal. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:14 am
Co-authors Paul Yale and Rusty Tucker Herein, highlights from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Briggs, et al. v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 12:06 am
Today the Washington Supreme Court hears arguments in King v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 3:09 pm
Have a central location -- maybe as part of the superior court's web site -- where all these notices can be made. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 9:56 am
” In the denial of the cellphone tower data case (Davis v. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 4:30 am
And absent such a showing, the University is not violating the Constitution under the Davis opinion.It is true that for a while now the Court has held that all racial classifications get strict scrutiny, which is the reason the Court struck down Virginia's ban on interracial marriages in Loving v. [read post]
