Search for: "Dean v. Arena" Results 41 - 60 of 95
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Although marriage is a fundamental right, this is not a case—like Loving or, more recently, Obergefell v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Above all that, it was clearly wrongly decided, and illustrates how some judges have bad interpretive instincts when it comes to navigating the tricky but ultra-important voting rights realm.The case, Texas Democratic Party v. [read post]
Supreme Court in this Term’s most important case addressing the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause, Town of Greece v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:45 pm by Legal Aggregate
Stanford Law School Interim Dean and Professor Robert WeisbergRobert Weisberg, JD ’79, Interim Dean, Edwin E. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
In spite of (or perhaps because of) the fact that the Supreme Court’s per curiam opinion two weeks ago in the Wisconsin election case, Republican National Committee (RNC) v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 9:50 am by Michael W. Huseman
Dean Prosser expanded the tort with court approval in his treatise (D. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 9:53 am
City of Omaha, 447 F.3d 552 (8th Cir. 2006); Dean v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 8:22 am by Eugene Volokh
(Dean Mouhtaropoulos/Getty Images) A nice analysis of the issue from Laughman v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In my last column, Part I of this Two-Part series, I argued that lower courts are justified in paying (indeed perhaps required to pay) close attention to Justice Kennedy’s concurring opinion in this summer’s blockbuster Burwell v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:22 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
-M.Th.D. ten Napel,  Leiden Law School, Institute for Public Law, Section of Constitutional and Administrative Law, The Netherlands, “Religious Pluralism, Eastern Ethnical Monism and Western ‘Civic Totalism’” Nicolae V. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
In Chippewas of Mnjikaning First Nation v. [read post]