Search for: "Dean v. Harris"
Results 41 - 60
of 369
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2021, 12:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
Under the Constitution, the Vice President, now Kamala Harris, is the designated “President of the Senate,” empowered to run all Senate proceedings—which presumably includes impeachment trials. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 5:00 am
[A belated update on my accomplishments in 2020.] [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm
Harris’ tie-breaking vote) could decide this question for itself, and rely on the Nixon v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
Levin (Georgia), Dean Lyrissa Lidsky (Missouri), Clare Norins (Georgia), David F. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
Palm Beach County Canvassing Board, decided shortly before Bush v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:00 pm
But the Court itself issued no ruling.More than a century later, the Court entered the fray in Bush v. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
On December 14 (the date set by the Electoral Count Act of 1887 for electors to come together and vote) they should support Joe Biden and Kamala Harris if the vote tally then shows that Biden and Harris won in that state.They will have the law on their side. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 9:04 pm
Supreme Court’s landmark environmental decision in Michigan v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 7:23 am
That's the headline on a May 20, 2020 WaPo article by lawprof Sanford V. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 3:35 am
So for anyone whether you the only shortcut you may know is Ctrl C and Ctrl V. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 3:00 pm
For example, in the 2015 case Harris v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 8:20 am
William Wine was a financial manager who stole roughly $1,000,000 from his client, Harry Dean Stanton. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 7:00 am
Vance and Trump v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
As the Court put it four years ago in Fisher v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
”Thus, in Lockett v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 6:50 am
Visciotti; and (2) whether the OCCA was objectively unreasonable in crediting the testimony of three experts who opined that the respondent, Jimmy Dean Harris, was not intellectually disabled and in not crediting the testimony of the one dissenting doctor, who has been censured, used an outdated test, made no assessment of adaptive functioning and disregarded the influence of factors he acknowledged could influence IQ test scores. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 7:58 am
Frase, Richard S. and Julian V. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
Then in 1973 the Supreme Court of Canada case Calder v. [read post]
