Search for: "Dept. of Human Services v. S. A. S."
Results 41 - 60
of 275
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2008, 12:10 pm
Employer has the burden of proof that a disability prevents the employee from reasonably performing the functions and duties of the positionMatter of New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs. v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 2008 NY Slip Op 09517, Decided on December 4, 2008, Appellate Division, ThirdNew York State Correction Officer Edward J. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 3:23 pm
Cullman County Dept. of Human Resources (Indian Child Welfare Act - Notice) Zaunbrecher v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 2:11 pm
Arkansas Dept. of Health and Human Servs. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Determining the economic damage suffered by a victim of unlawful discriminationRensselaer County Sheriff's Dept. v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 2018 NY Slip Op 05719, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe Appellate Division reviewed a determination of the Commissioner of Human Rights' award of damages to compensate Lora Abbott Seabury for the pension benefits that she lost due to the Rensselaer County Sheriff's Department… [read post]
23 May 2007, 6:03 am
Department of Health and Human Services a plan detailing how the State will expend federal funds. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 6:31 pm
Illinois, State of/Dept. of Human Services, involves an employee who got hurt while working as a replacement manager. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 6:48 pm
Arkansas Dept. of Human Services v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:52 am
Dept. of Health and Human Services, although striking down the individual mandate as an exercise of congressional power under the Commerce Clause, purports to reject the activity/inactivity distinction on which many have relied to reach the same conclusion. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
Determining if a complaint alleging sexual harassment based a claim of a continuing violation of New York State's Human Rights Law is timelyLozada v Elmont Hook & Ladder Co. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 10:04 am
Florida Dept. of Revenue (sovereign immunity, taxation) on 9/25/14. * U.S. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division's ruling states:"The article 78 court correctly determined, upon consideration of all the facts, that respondents' denial of petitioner's application for reinstatement to his former position with NYCHA was not arbitrary and capricious or an abuse of discretion (see Matter of Roberts v Gavin, 96 AD3d 669, 671 [1st Dept 2012]). [read post]
3rd Circuit Denies Stay Pending Appeal In Small Business Challenge to Contraceptive Coverage Mandate
8 Feb 2013, 1:11 pm
Dept. of Health and Human Services, (7th Cir., Jan. 29, 2013), Judge Rendell in her majority opinion concluded that the Mennonite owners of a wood specialties manufacturing company had failed to show a reasonable likelihood of success on the merits of their free exercise, RFRA or Establishment Clause claims. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
Dept. of Correctional Servs. v Kinsella, 220 AD2d 19, 22). [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
Dept. of Correctional Servs. v Kinsella, 220 AD2d 19, 22). [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
Dept. of Correctional Servs. v Kinsella, 220 AD2d 19, 22). [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
Dept. of Correctional Servs. v Kinsella, 220 AD2d 19, 22). [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:30 am
Dept. of Health & Human Services 23 serve as tactical guideposts. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 4:23 am
"*** The New York State's Human Rights Law, [Executive Law §296(15)] and the New York City's Human Rights Law [Administrative Code §8-107(10)] also prohibit rejection of applicants for public employment based solely on a criminal conviction.The decision is posted on the Internet at:[www.nycourts.gov] [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 7:30 am
Decisions involving an employee’s use of the employer's electronic equipment that resulted in disciplinary action being taken against an employee [Internet links highlighted in color]Sprague v Spokane Valley Fire Department Sprague v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 10:46 am
Dept. of Health and Human Services, another constitutional challenge to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). [read post]