Search for: "Direct Supply, Inc. v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 615
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2015, 12:30 am
Actually, Mr Justice Arnold had himself moved away from the idea already - he distinguished his decision in the later case of Idenix Pharmaceutical, Inc v Gilead Sciences, Inc (reported by IPKat here) in which he declined to construe a claim narrowly on the basis of the prosecution history.This did not however have any effect on the outcome - Floyd LJ otherwise endorsed Arnold J's application of the Protocol questions to likewise find that there was no… [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 2:01 pm
United Air Lines, Inc. and Toyota Motor Manufacturer v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 2:42 pm
United States, 278F.3d 641, 643 (6th Cir. 2002); Schubert v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:06 am
(“Droste”) of Evansville, Indiana, and Shah Diamonds, Inc., D/B/A Shah Luxury (“Shah”) of New York, New York, infringed rights in United States Copyright Registration No. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 7:32 am
Blumenauer (D-OR), would direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) to ensure a supply of marijuana for research purposes through the NIDA Drug Supply Program. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 2:42 am
Devon IT, Inc. a U.S. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:01 pm
What United States Supreme Court decisions actually get the most action in legal circles? [read post]
7 May 2020, 7:01 am
United States Department of Commerce and Litgo N.J., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm
One of the most important, if not the most important, United States copyright cases decided in 2013 is The Authors Guild, Inc. v Google Inc. 2013 WL 6017130 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 7:30 am
SEB S.A. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 1:28 pm
Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 5:30 am
The disputed technology involved intrusion detection systems that Advantor originally sold certain United States Air Force bases. [read post]
13 May 2009, 2:06 am
--Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of WisconsinOpinion Date: 4/20/09Cite: Dental Health Products, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 10:02 am
Last June, the Supreme Court appeared to clarify the issue, ruling in RJR Nabisco Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 10:05 pm
Concluding that LPI had not met its burden, the Maryland District Court then found: "LPI is actively involved with filing Lupin’s ANDAs with the FDA, and marketing and distributing the approved generic drugs in the United States. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:18 pm
, Limelight Networks, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 3:16 pm
In 1990, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Stewart v. [read post]
Bowman v Monsanto: the US Supreme Court rules on patent exhaustion and replication of patented seeds
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
The Supreme Court noted that, under the doctrine of patent exhaustion, 'the initial authorised sale of a patented item terminates all patent rights to that item' (Quanta Computer Inc. v LG Electronics Inc.): the rationale behind this rule is that, once a patentee has received his reward through the sale of the patented item, he has no further right to restrain the use or enjoyment of it (United States v Univis Lens Co.). [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 7:13 am
United States. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 11:08 am
According to the CDC, it is estimated that 1.4 million cases of salmonellosis occur each year in the United States. [read post]
