Search for: "Disciplinary Counsel v. York" Results 41 - 60 of 406
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2009, 4:05 am
Appointing authority's final determination as whether or not to take disciplinary action against an employee controlsRosenblum v New York City Conflicts of Interest Board, 2009 NY Slip Op 31073(U), April 29, 2009, Supreme Court, New York County, Docket Number: 101121/09, Judge Jane S. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Procedural considerations relevant to conducting a disciplinary hearing pursuant to §75 of the Civil Service LawTinter v Board of Trustees of the Pound Ridge Lib. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Procedural considerations relevant to conducting a disciplinary hearing pursuant to §75 of the Civil Service LawTinter v Board of Trustees of the Pound Ridge Lib. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 3:32 am
Individual dismissed after being found guilty of stealing from a fellow employee Clinkscales v Kelly, 2012 NY Slip Op 04287, Appellate Division, First Department New York City Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly dismissed a police officer found guilty of disciplinary charges that alleged that the officer had stolen a money order from a fellow officer and deposited it in her bank account. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:05 pm
The employer, however, may not use the counseling memorandum or a performance evaluation to avoid initiating formal disciplinary action against an individual as the Fusco and Irving decisions by the Commissioner of Education demonstrate [Fusco v Jefferson County School District, CEd, 14,396 and Irving v Troy City School District, CEd 14,373]. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 4:50 am
Employee’s lack of remorse concerning activities leading to disciplinary action does not always mandate imposing termination as the penalty City of New York v Organization of Staff Analysts, 2013 NY Slip Op 00806, Appellate Division, First Department The Appellate Division affirmed Supreme Court’s denial of the City of New York’s petition to vacate an arbitrator’s award imposing a penalty of a one-year suspension without pay rather… [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 3:24 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Rubin v EFP Rotenberg, LLP  2020 NY Slip Op 32714(U)  August 19, 2020 Supreme Court, New York County  Docket Number: 651825/2015 Judge: Barbara Jaffe discusses what disciplinary or governmental investigation materials may be relevant to a claim of professional malpractice. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 10:28 am by lennyesq
From the New York Labor & Law Report-Bond, Schoeneck & King (an excellent free resource for NYS labor law-public and private) Although public employers may be aware of their obligation to provide certain types of employees with an opportunity for a hearing prior to imposing discipline (such as a written reprimand), the line between a non-disciplinary counseling memorandum and a disciplinary reprimand is not always clear. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 10:28 am by lennyesq
From the New York Labor & Law Report-Bond, Schoeneck & King (an excellent free resource for NYS labor law-public and private) Although public employers may be aware of their obligation to provide certain types of employees with an opportunity for a hearing prior to imposing discipline (such as a written reprimand), the line between a non-disciplinary counseling memorandum and a disciplinary reprimand is not always clear. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 5:20 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Determining an appropriate disciplinary penalty "under the circumstances"King v New York State Off. of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Servs., 2017 NY Slip Op 03098, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentFigueroa v New York State Off. of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Servs., 2017 NY Slip Op 03104, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentAs the Court of Appeals explained in Pell v Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 1 of Towns… [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The employee’s counsel, on the other hand, described the pre-trial meeting as consisting of a five-minute conversation in which counsel informed the witnesses about why they were present and asked them to simply testify as to what they remembered about the incident. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division affirmed Supreme Court’s ruling, explaining that judicial review of and authority to vacate a hearing officer's determination of disciplinary charges against a tenured teacher is limited to the grounds set forth in CPLR 7511(b)(1), including acts in excess of the arbitrator's power [and citing City School District of New York v McGraham, 17 NY3d 917] [w]here, as here, parties are subject to compulsory arbitration, the award must… [read post]