Search for: "District Attorney for the N. Dist. v. Superior Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 65
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2015, 12:04 pm
SUPERIOR RECHARGE SYSTEMS, LLC, Tex: Court of Appeals, 2nd Dist. 2013 RICHMONT HOLDINGS, INC., NUKOTE HOLDING, INC., NUKOTE INTERNATIONAL, INC., INKBRARY, LLC, SUPERIOR ACQUISITIONS LLC, JOHN P. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:04 pm
Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 2:08 pm
Superior Court. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 2:08 pm
Superior Court. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 2:33 pm
E060038), the Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the Riverside County Superior Court’s judgment denying a petition for a writ of mandate challenging an EIR for the Perris Dam Remediation Project. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:49 pm
V. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
Delivery Ass’n v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:53 am
In a recent decision extensively analyzing and applying CEQA’s rules on alternatives analysis, recirculation, and a petitioner’s burden to show agency error, the Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the Nevada County Superior Court’s judgment denying a writ petition challenging a commercial real estate project. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:35 am
Mallis, 485 A.2d 423, n. 6 (Pa.Super. 1984) and Surace v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 11:53 am
Dist. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 6:13 am
Mira Owners Ass’n v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Most cases are, by default, in the Superior Court. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
Attorney General, et al. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:52 am
[viii] While the layoff rights of employees during a probationary period are superior to those of temporary and provisional appointees, they are subordinate to the layoff rights vested in tenured employees, i.e., individuals that have already satisfactorily completed their probationary period and individuals holding a contingent permanent appointment that have completed their probationary period. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm
Dist. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
From my LexisNexis Alerts on "Graves Amendment" court decisions come these, mostly recent New York cases: AUTO – GRAVES AMENDMENT – LEASED VEHICLE – NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY Brown v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:58 am
An attorney’s superior performance can result in enhanced attorney’s fees but only in extraordinary circumstances, held the Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision; the Court affirmed its position that attorney’s fees based on a lodestar calculation, under federal fee-shifting statutes, can be enhanced in certain situations. [read post]
21 May 2010, 1:26 pm
” IdFederal district courts must apply the choice of law rules of the state in which they sit when jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
A district court may award attorneys' fees to a prevailing plaintiff “ ‘in all but very unusual circumstances[.] [read post]