Search for: "District Atty Office"
Results 41 - 60
of 185
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2023, 11:04 am
Atty. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 6:11 am
” “The inquirer cited former JEAC opinions 04-06 and 10-36 as precedent, which outlined recusal or disclosure based on a judicial officer’s prior legal employment. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:12 am
District Judge Keith P. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 6:11 am
Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Georgia about whether he had any involvement with the suit during his tenure with the office. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 6:25 am
” “Hours after taking office as San Francisco’s District Attorney on July 8, Brooke Jenkins’ office sought to have two cases transferred to another jurisdiction because of a potential conflict she feared would tarnish her public image. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 8:02 am
Refuses To Lift Atty’s USPTO Conflict Suspension” — “The Federal Circuit on Friday refused to block an attorney’s suspension from practicing before the U.S. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 8:02 am
Refuses To Lift Atty’s USPTO Conflict Suspension” — “The Federal Circuit on Friday refused to block an attorney’s suspension from practicing before the U.S. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 8:14 am
Kenna said it was a very small law firm, with attorneys working in a small San Francisco office. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 8:08 am
Fights AT&T Bid To Disqualify Its Ex-BigLaw Attys” — “U.S. [read post]
27 Mar 2021, 4:57 pm
" That's what my office did. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 8:07 am
” “Law Offices of Manuel Solis seeks more than $1 million in damages from Lizzett Aguilar Navarrete in the breach of noncompetition suit it filed last week in state district court in Houston. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 9:07 am
I thank the US Atty Fajardo for entrusting me and having the confidence in me to work these cases and to Willy Ferrer for hiring me. [read post]
31 May 2020, 10:00 pm
Blog post written by Atty. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 4:26 pm
The 9th affirmed convictions for fraud despite a clear error in the jury instruction and shenanigans with the US Atty’s Office in Cal Central. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 8:59 pm
Inmates or incarcerated youth, or Correction Officers or Youth Workers, were not part of the priority groups. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
** Public Officers Law §15 provides that the acts of a public officer done without his or her taking or filing an official oath are valid and that this section has been interpreted to confer a right to "the statutory compensation therefor" [Opinions of the Attorney General, 1903 Ops Atty Gen 487 and 1979 Ops Atty Gen 29].The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.counsel.nysed.gov/Decisions/volume59/d17790 [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
** Public Officers Law §15 provides that the acts of a public officer done without his or her taking or filing an official oath are valid and that this section has been interpreted to confer a right to "the statutory compensation therefor" [Opinions of the Attorney General, 1903 Ops Atty Gen 487 and 1979 Ops Atty Gen 29].The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.counsel.nysed.gov/Decisions/volume59/d17790 [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
** Public Officers Law §15 provides that the acts of a public officer done without his or her taking or filing an official oath are valid and that this section has been interpreted to confer a right to "the statutory compensation therefor" [Opinions of the Attorney General, 1903 Ops Atty Gen 487 and 1979 Ops Atty Gen 29].The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.counsel.nysed.gov/Decisions/volume59/d17790 [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
** Public Officers Law §15 provides that the acts of a public officer done without his or her taking or filing an official oath are valid and that this section has been interpreted to confer a right to "the statutory compensation therefor" [Opinions of the Attorney General, 1903 Ops Atty Gen 487 and 1979 Ops Atty Gen 29].The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.counsel.nysed.gov/Decisions/volume59/d17790 [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 8:17 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled on July 11, that Jennifer Fischman, former acting general counsel and chief compliance officer of Mitsubishi Chemical Holdings, did not rely on privileged and/or confidential client information in asserting claims of sex discrimination and retaliation against her former employer. [read post]
