Search for: "District of Columbia v. Armes" Results 41 - 60 of 1,062
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2023, 1:37 am by Kalvis Golde
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed. [read post]
14 May 2023, 8:27 am
An individual right to “keep and bear arms” for purposes unrelated to militia or military service was not recognized until the Supreme Court’s 2008 decision, applying what it took to be the original meaning of the Second Amendment, in District of Columbia v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 8:27 am by Christine Corcos
An individual right to “keep and bear arms” for purposes unrelated to militia or military service was not recognized until the Supreme Court’s 2008 decision, applying what it took to be the original meaning of the Second Amendment, in District of Columbia v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:15 am by Lawrence Solum
An individual right to “keep and bear arms” for purposes unrelated to militia or military service was not recognized until the Supreme Court’s 2008 decision, applying what it took to be the original meaning of the Second Amendment, in District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
” Moreover, the earlier ban was imposed in 1994 — before the Supreme Court ruled in District of Columbia v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Saraphin Dhanani
On April 7, in a 2-1 decision, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed the ruling of U.S. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 9:27 am by Eugene Volokh
If some Justices think that Bruen or District of Columbia v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 2:26 pm by Samuel Bray
Meinhold, 510 U.S. 939 (1993) (granting stay of Armed-Forces-wide injunction, except as to individual plaintiff ). [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am by David Kopel
District of Columbia, 670 F.3d 1244 (D.C. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 5:56 pm by Aaron L. Nielson
Overall, the court concluded that the District of Columbia’s concealed carry law was a constitutionally permissible regulation of the Second Amendment right to bear arms, and it upheld the law’s constitutionality. [read post]