Search for: "District of Columbia v. Sullivan"
Results 41 - 60
of 173
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2009, 12:47 am
Sullivan of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia issued this show cause order in Adolph v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 1:58 pm
District Court Judge Emmet G. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 12:15 pm
On April 12, 2022, Judge Claire V. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
British Columbia, by Robert T. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 8:44 am
District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 1:25 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia on Dec. 7. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 9:39 am
Supreme Court case called Rinaldi v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am
After hearing, the motion is ALLOWED in part. 1 Plaintiff asserts violations of the false claims acts in California, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, Nevada, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, District of Columbia, and New York. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 9:20 am
In 2009, Judge Emmet Sullivan of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia vacated the conviction of United States Senator Ted Stevens of Alaska after prosecutors failed to disclose exculpatory evidence. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:51 pm
As New York Times v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:25 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia issued her decision in the long-running dispute concerning FDA’s July 23, 2010 approval of Sandoz Inc. [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:55 am
District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 8:24 am
Sullivan, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit approved the use of statistical sampling and extrapolation by Medicare contractors, currently known as MACs or ZPICs, in conducting post payment reviews. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 10:24 am
Of note, the magistrate concluded that the record showed the OFCCP did not comply with the standard set forth in the DC district court’s 2000 decision in Beverly Enterprises v Herman (79 EPD ¶40,258) regarding the initial selection of BOA for review. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 12:31 am
Sullivan’s order does not indicate whether Schuelke and Shields recommended that the attorneys be reported to the Bar for possible disciplinary action or whether they should be banned from further appearances before the District Court for the District of Columbia where the trial was held. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 9:15 am
District Court for the District of Columbia by the attorneys who represented Heller. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 11:30 am
District of Columbia, et al. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 11:08 am
In Doe v. [read post]
Latest Twist in the Flynn Case Highlights the Danger of Judicial Deference to Trump’s Administration
24 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
Yesterday’s decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia is the latest twist in Michael Flynn’s prosecution for lying to federal agents about his contacts with Russia’s ambassador to the U.S. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:51 am
Citing an earlier Supreme Court ATS case, Sosa v. [read post]
