Search for: "Do No Harm v. Pfizer Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 95
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
  Two other state supreme courts have reaffirmed the learned intermediary rule since then, Wyeth, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 5:35 am
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
In Panuwat, the defendant was an employee of Medivation, Inc., a mid-cap oncology firm that was resisting one hostile bidder (Sanofi S.A.) and encouraging another firm (Pfizer) to outbid Sanofi. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 7:11 am
The Court, with two Justices not participating, also asked the Solicitor General to express views on Pfizer Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
Pfizer, Inc., 153 S.W.3d 758, 761 (Ky. 2004); McCombs v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Pfizer Inc., 358 F.3d 659, 661 (9th Cir. 2004) (same; physician considered warning inappropriate) (applying California law).Under these facts, if Conte were an ordinary prescription drug product liability case, plaintiff would have been out of court and out of luck, just like Motus. [read post]
1 May 2008, 11:21 am
Beretta USA, Inc., No. 05-6942-cv (2d Cir. [read post]