Search for: "Doctor v. Employment Division"
Results 41 - 60
of 359
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2017, 5:35 am
It is styled, Martha Shindoll v. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 9:00 am
This section does not limit employment by a professional corporation designated in this section to only those licensed professionals listed under each subdivision. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
Judge Miller recommended termination of A.M. employment. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 4:02 am
Ordering worker to report to agency’s medical clinic for an examination does result in liability if the employee’s injury is exacerbating as a resultBonomonte v City of New York, 2010 NY Slip Op 09165, Decided on December 14, 2010, Appellate Division, First DepartmentDominic Bonomonte, a New York City Sanitation employee was on sick leave due to surgeries to his arm. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 7:39 am
The employer appealed that finding to the Appellate Division, which affirmed Fuller's victory. [read post]
15 Sep 2012, 11:18 am
In the case, Custin v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 10:17 am
U.S. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 7:37 am
The New Jersey Appellate Division has ruled that an employer’s pregnancy leave policy that requires pregnant employees to exhaust their accrued paid sick and vacation time to be in violation the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 9:41 am
Hoover, et al v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 5:00 am
” The attorney for the employer failed to call the doctor as a witness during the trial. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 10:00 pm
On appeal the Appellate Division reversed, stating that all the areas of the body which hurt petitioner while working in these subsequent employments were the same areas he originally injured in 1982. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Indeed, the purpose of section 71 is to involve a neutral agency and a physician, independent of both the employee and the employer, with appropriate oversight. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 6:15 am
In Unifor, Local 2215 v IMP Group Ltd (Aerospace Division) (AB Grievance), [2019] NSLAA No 4, Arbitrator Richardson determined that an employee’s on the job masturbation was not justified by his reported sex addiction and upheld the employer’s decision to terminate. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 9:01 am
But in Smith v. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 11:48 am
Delanoy v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 1:42 pm
Last month, in Gibbs v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 2:25 pm
Jenkins v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 4:00 pm
For a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Matter of New York State Energy Research & Development Authority v. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 5:25 am
In 1992, Doctors Steven P. [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 3:52 pm
Doctor Moline, why can’t you be true? [read post]
