Search for: "Doe Defendants Nos. 1 and 2"
Results 41 - 60
of 395
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
Rio Tinto plc, 17-cv-7994, ECF Nos. 239, 260. [12] SEC v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 6:34 am
John Doe Nos. 1-25, Case No. 154644/2022, NYSCEF Doc. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 3:44 am
That fall, defendants wrote four letters to DEC regarding tidal wetlands permit nos. 1- 4 728-03511, 1-4 728-05497, 1-4 728-05498 and 1-4 728-05499, which allowed Village People to construct four single-family residences on its properties (id., ,i 10; NYSCEF Doc No. 40 at 103, 107, 112 and 135). [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Some have argued that, because the Nation’s approach to climate change is politically contested,[1] and since these matters affect major policy questions over which Congress has not granted the SEC new, explicit powers, the Commission lacks authority to require disclosure in this area.[2] For the reasons given below, the Commission should disregard these claims, focusing instead on the challenging policy choices that any finalization of the proposal would require. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 5:24 pm
The employer has no obligation to provide the second bucket of leave if the employee does not have proof of the positive test for themselves or their family member. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 2:56 am
Does it require the defendant to have breached a legal duty to disclose? [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 12:26 pm
Doe Nos. 1-5, No. 12-CV-6152 (VM) (KNF), 2012 WL 5899331, at *7 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 11:55 am
Code, which provides that “[a]ny civil action for patent infringement may be brought in the judicial district [1] where the defendant resides, or [2] where the defendant commits acts of infringement and has a regular and established place of business. [read post]
2 May 2022, 4:09 am
Cyberman Security, LLC AKA The CyberHero Adventures: Defenders of the Digital Universe, Oppositions Nos. 91249427 and 91253845 [Section 2(d) oppositions to registration of CYBERHERO for video game software and accessories and THE CYBERHERO ADVENTURES DEFENDERS OF THE DIGITAL for "comic books," in view of the registered mark CYBERHERO LEAGUE and the common law mark CYBERHERO for educational gaming services and toys, games, and gaming materials and… [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 8:00 am
In ascertaining whether the exercise of specific personal jurisdiction is appropriate in a given case, we consider: (1) whether the defendant “purposefully directed” its activities at residents of the forum; and (2) whether the claim “arise[s] out of or relate[s] to” the defendant’s activities within the forum. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 6:53 am
Sycamore, Nos. 18-4062, 19-4031,19-4040 (10th Cir. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 5:25 am
Longchamp's Le Pliage 1623 Nylon (left) and the defendant's product (right)CommentThe Longchamp case adds to a series of decisions in which the question of the type(s) of IP protection available to shapes was key.Only a few weeks ago, The IPKat reported on the most recent Moon Boot trade mark decision, highlighting a situation which is the reverse of what happened in Longchamp: while in Longchamp the shape mark registrations were not questioned but copyright protection was… [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 3:47 am
Pavel Vidal has recently published a quite interesting study, "El impacto económico de lassanciones estadounidense a Cuba, 1994-2020" ("The Economic Impact of US sanctions on Cuba 1994-2020"), Documento de trabajo 1/2022 - 7/2/2022 - Real Instituto Elcano. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 10:09 pm
Appellants filed their revised brief on June 1, 2021 in which they argue that the FTC does not have the authority to impose some of the remedies that the FTC has imposed. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act Comity Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Nos. 18-cv-8248, 18-cv-11167. [read post]
The Slovak Constitutional Court on Risk Profiling and Automated Decision-Making by the Tax Authority
17 Dec 2021, 11:46 am
The United Kingdom). , Nos 58170/13, 62322/14, 24960/15, paragraph 4).122. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 12:37 pm
(hereinafter “Inspire”) (“JJ” and “Inspire” collectively hereinafter “Jimmy John’s Corporate”) (all defendants collectively hereinafter “Defendants” or “Jimmy John’s”), as follows: PARTIES Travis and Aimee Knorr are residents of the State of Utah. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am
As a threshold matter, respondent argues that the appeal must be dismissed because the November 2020 order does not constitute a final judgment (see CPLR 5701 [b] [1]; Matter of Alexander M. v Cleary, 188 AD3d 1471, 1473 [2020]; see also CPLR 5701 [a] [1]). [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am
As a threshold matter, respondent argues that the appeal must be dismissed because the November 2020 order does not constitute a final judgment (see CPLR 5701 [b] [1]; Matter of Alexander M. v Cleary, 188 AD3d 1471, 1473 [2020]; see also CPLR 5701 [a] [1]). [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 1:03 pm
Brennan, No. 19-5885, ECF Nos. 17-18 (E.D. [read post]
