Search for: "Doe v. Coughlin" Results 41 - 60 of 106
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Case law indicates that in the absence of extenuating circumstances such as an excessively lengthy or intense questioning, courts will not deem the individual's resignation to have been obtained under duress.In Rychlick v Coughlin, 63 NY2d 643, the Court of Appeal addressed a situation where an employee was offered the option of resigning from his position or having formal disciplinary charges filed against him. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Case law indicates that in the absence of extenuating circumstances such as an excessively lengthy or intense questioning, courts will not deem the individual's resignation to have been obtained under duress.In Rychlick v Coughlin, 63 NY2d 643, the Court of Appeal addressed a situation where an employee was offered the option of resigning from his position or having formal disciplinary charges filed against him. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:15 pm by Alan Z. Rozenshtein
. *** I What does the twilight of modern democracy look like? [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As to the issue of a resignation being coerced from an employee or obtained under duress, the courts have concluded that where an appointing authority has the right, if not the duty, to take disciplinary action against an individual, "it was not duress to threaten to do what one had the legal right to do" [Rychlick v Coughlin, 63 NY2d 643].Rychlick, in the presence of a union representative, was told that unless he submitted his resignation formal disciplinary charges… [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
         Evidence of IntoxicationIn the case of Coughlin v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 6:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Thus, said the court, “[f]urther action by DOE was not required nor did Petitioner's letters to DOE after that date extend the statute of limitations, citing Lubin v Board of Education of the City of New York, 60 NY2d 974.In any event, the Appellate Division noted that there was “a rational basis for DOE's determination terminating Petitioner’s employment based on her resignation in the face of disciplinary charges, and the… [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 5:29 am
We hold that the circuit court was correct: Arkansas law does not recognize an independent breach-of-loyalty claim on this case's facts, and we decline to recognize one at this time.Infinity Headwear & Apparel, LLC v. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 2:01 pm
Further, Ellis v Wirshba, another case defendants cite, does not support defendants' contention that venue should be changed to Westchester County. [read post]