Search for: "Doe v. Department of Professional Regulation"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,069
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2010, 7:03 am
Court of Appeals concluded in Wang v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 7:15 am
” Teladoc Incorporated et al. v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 1:32 pm
Ctr. for Food Safety v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 4:06 pm
Real Estate Licensed Professionals Are Regulated and Overseen by the State of Florida The Florida Real Estate Commission is a state agency that is a part of the the State of Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation’s Division of Real Estate (the other part is the Florida Real Estate Appraisal Board). [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:33 am
Department of Financial and Professional Regulation. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 6:29 am
Munro v. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 11:52 pm
Only in this context does the draft regulation explicitly rule out further "review". [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 8:48 pm
Citing General Motors of Canada Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 6:15 am
” What does this mean for tax professionals? [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 3:30 am
Does your strategy now change? [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 8:38 am
Data shows that police presence does not make schools safer; to the contrary, it can lead to disproportionate arrests of students of color and students with disabilities. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 11:05 am
The Department of Justice supported a narrower result-- striking down only the mandate and parts of the insurance regulations. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 1:34 pm
See Locke v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 am
Ohio, Miranda v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 11:21 am
Does the Internal Revenue Service have the right to regulate tax preparers? [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Department of Labor (“DOL” or “Department”) released its final fiduciary rule, marking the completion of its third attempt since 2010 to update the definition of what it means to be an investment advice fiduciary to IRAs and ERISA Plans. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 10:53 am
[ “[T]he great deference due state economic regulation does not demand judicial blindness to the history of a challenged rule or the context of its adoption nor does it require courts to accept nonsensical explanations for regulation. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:36 am
Vaz v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 12:00 pm
The case is Lubov v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 3:59 pm
This article discusses the implications of GINA on professional sports: specifically, part II of the articles discusses GINA in detail, part III discusses GINA’s impact on professional sports, part IV discusses GINA’s economic impact on professional sports, and part V provides some concluding remarks. [read post]
