Search for: "Doe v. Dept. of Social Services" Results 41 - 60 of 237
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
Clarence N., 110 A.D.3d 430, 430–431, 972 N.Y.S.2d 245 [1st Dept. 2013]; Matter of Jose M. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 07571 (4th Dept., 2018) the Appellate Division affirmed an order that, inter alia, confirmed the determination of the Sup [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 07571 (4th Dept., 2018) the Appellate Division affirmed an order that, inter alia, confirmed the determination of the Sup [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 00352(3d Dept.,2021) the Appellate Division held that jurisdiction over a neglect proceeding does not depend upon the situs of the neglect. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 00352(3d Dept.,2021) the Appellate Division held that jurisdiction over a neglect proceeding does not depend upon the situs of the neglect. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court ordered the records in question produced for an in camera* inspection by the court and subsequently directed DOE to disclose the investigative file concerning “Office of Special Investigation Case 08-4247” except for certain pages, with any Social Security numbers redacted from such files. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 7:07 am by Joel R. Brandes
In a footnote the court urged the Legislature to expeditiously amend Social Services Law § 384–b (8) to address the concerns it raised. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 05640 (1st Dept., 2019) the Appellate Division held, as a matter of first impression for the Court, that  the Interstate Compact for the Placement of Children (ICPC), codified in Social Services Law '374Ba, does not apply to out‑of‑state noncustodial parents. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am by admin
Dept. of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658, 98 S.Ct. 2018, 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978) (overruling holding of Monroe v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 4:13 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, in view of the general rule that a lender, absent a special relationship with a borrower, does not owe a duty to verify the identity of an imposter who obtains a loan in a plaintiff’s name (see Landino v Bank of Am., 52 AD3d 571, 574-575 [2d Dept 2008]; Beckford v Northeastern Mtge. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 3:21 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Schwartz 279 AD2d 501 , 503 (2d Dept 2001)),  "Plaintiff, Lisa Blumencranz, retained the services of defendant, Allan S. [read post]
19 May 2015, 5:12 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Cortland County Department of Social Services, 186 AD2d 908 [3d Dept 1992], lv denied 81 NY2d 706 [1993]). [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 7:34 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The Court also left intact its landmark decision in Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am by Joel R. Brandes
” This statute, like Domestic Relations Law § 70, does not define the term “parent. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 12:07 pm by Joel R. Brandes
A week later, at the request of the Wayne County Department of Social Services, Family Court directed her temporary removal from Michelle E.C.'s custody pursuant to an ex parte pre-petition order under FCA § 1022. [read post]