Search for: "Doe v. Golding et al" Results 41 - 60 of 94
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2016, 8:58 am by Schachtman
  Although Jewell brought more statistical sophistication to the task, he could not transmute lead into gold; nor could he support the plaintiffs’ causal claims without committing most of the same fallacies found in Bérard’s opinions. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 3:00 am by Daphne Keller
   And it bears almost no relation to the gold standard for notice and takedown, developed by civil society groups and published in the Manila Principles. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 12:10 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
The court does not lay out a definitive test for determining the character of the social media account (business or personal?) [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:10 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Formerly the executive director of the National Congress of American Indians, she served as Legislative Liaison for the Native American Rights Fund and in the Carter Administration, and was lead plaintiff in Harjo et al v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:03 am
” The case, Solid 21 Inc. v Hublot of America, et al. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
DOES 1-99 ND Illi 2013http://t.co/namjuCtHIZ -> Supreme Court Denies Leave To Appeal In C-Map USA Inc., et al. v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:22 am by Benjamin Jackson
Cook-Deegan et al., Impact of gene patents and licensing practices on access to genetic testing for inherited susceptibility to cancer: Comparing breast and ovarian cancers with colon cancers, GENET. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 12:06 pm
Regional Government Services, et al, No. 56-2013-00432444-CU-OE-VTA, complaint (Cal. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 7:24 am
Likewise, the fact that directors are named in the suit does not mean that prior to the suit demand would have been futile. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
  The PLAC presentation also indicated that predictive coding had been approved in the case of Kleen Products LLC et al v. [read post]
District Court for the District of Oregon granted class certification in Whaley et al. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 1:29 pm by Bexis
  Any layperson understands that a household appliance does not spontaneously combust but for a defect, or that a machine does not suddenly and inexplicably retract unless it malfunctions. [read post]