Search for: "Doe v. High-Tech Institute, Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 163
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
But if the analysis is restricted to members of the high courts, the ratio shifts further in favor of the Texas Supreme Court& [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am by msatta
But in fact it is by far the most important institution in American antitrust. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 3:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 8:16 am by Eric Goldman
Regards, Eric Goldman Professor of Law and Co-Director, High Tech Law Institute Santa Clara University School of Law Lyrissa B. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 7:41 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Among other things, this case has some interesting things to say about IIC and proper controls in survey cases.Alzheimer’s Disease & Related Disorders Association, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 2:19 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Does drop frames.CO: how is it lossless then? [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
The content industries might be worried about the US tech giants, but the US tech giants will be looking East, at the astonishing growth of the likes of Baidu, JD.com and Albibaba. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
Start-ups forced to build them won’t be able to afford it, or will build lousy ones with high error rates. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm by Daphne Keller
Start-ups forced to build them won’t be able to afford it, or will build lousy ones with high error rates. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
Apple, the high-stakes design patent dispute, noting that “the Court must consider the risk of either stifling innovation in the tech world or creating an avenue for ‘copycats. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm by Sarah Andropoulos
Ivy Tech Community CollegeA recent and notable example of this rejection is the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals’ July 2016 opinion in Hively v. [read post]