Search for: "Doe v. State of Vermont et al" Results 41 - 60 of 80
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2015, 5:44 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
While the Supreme Court ruling in 2012′s National Federation of Independent Business et al v Sebelius in 2012 (when SCOTUS ruled that ACA was constitutional) allowed states to expand their Medicaid coverage under ACA in exchange for new funds (assuming that they agreed to the terms and conditions), it also gave states an out. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
See also Manual at 614 n. 198., citing Ofer Shpilberg, et al., The Next Stage: Molecular Epidemiology, 50 J. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
The following is the text of a memo from the Disability Rights Legal Center on its recently filed case Brody et al v California, that aims to expand end-of-life choice to include the option of aid in dying.Background Mentally competent terminally ill patients may find themselves trapped in a dying process they find unbearable, even with excellent pain and symptom management. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 8:06 pm by A. Brian Albritton
Kentucky Higher Education Student Loan Corporation et al, No. 10-2320, June 18, 2012. [read post]
12 May 2012, 5:50 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 These cases involve challenges to the DOMA or to state laws that define marriage to the exclusion of same-sex couples.We here at the Law Blogger have been following this issue over the past few years; here are some of our earlier posts tracking the subject:Illinois Becomes 6th State to Recognize Same-Sex Unions    January 2011Same-Sex Marriage Cases Go Constitutional    April 2010There are three cases in the same-sex marriage pack that seem to be headed… [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
That the State finds expression too persuasive does not permit it to quiet the speech or to burden its messengers”. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 2:14 pm by Deven McGraw
IMS Health, Inc. et al., striking down as unconstitutional a Vermont statute that prohibited the use of drug prescribing information for marketing purposes. [read post]