Search for: "Double A, Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 4,077
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2014, 4:00 am by JD Hull
As some of you know, although I will continue to grow Hull McGuire and continue to serve its longstanding client base, I have agreed to serve as the first General Counsel of Double Bridge Publishing Company, Inc.. [read post]
17 May 2007, 2:03 pm
If the allegations of a recently filed class action complaint are true, defense contractor Michael Bianco, Inc. of New Bedford, MA, got too cute in its effort to avoid paying overtime wages to its workers.The Boston Herald reports that about 500 workers, many of... [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 2:33 am
While it is rare, on ocassion, a client may be ordered to pay double fees in a contingent fee case. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 2:33 am
While it is rare, on ocassion, a client may be ordered to pay double fees in a contingent fee case. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 4:19 pm by Andy Weisbecker
Moscahlades Bros Inc. of Paterson, NJ is recalling Hellas Golden Double Smoked Herring because it has the potential to be contaminated with Clostridium botulinum, a bacterium which can cause life­ threatening illness or death. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 9:51 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- The Federal Circuit extended the scope of the judicially created doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting (OTDP) in a split decision rendered in Gilead Sciences Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 12:00 am by Caleb Hinton
Failure to Vacate These rules were illustrated in Lincoln Oldsmobile, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 1:00 am by Leon Y. Lum
Teva Parenteral Medicines, Inc., the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s decision that Eli Lilly’s patent to pemetrexed is not invalid for obviousness-type double patenting. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:00 am by Courtenay Brinckerhoff
Sandoz, Inc., the Federal Circuit upheld the district court’s determination that the claims at issue were neither obvious nor invalid under the doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting based on a “lead compound” approach to the obviousness... [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 9:22 pm
The amount is more than six times the $2.8 billion reserve for Enron, WorldCom Inc. and initial public offering-related litigation that Citigroup disclosed in a Nov. 5 regulatory filing.Citigroup Trial May Double Enron Creditors' Payout [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 10:30 am
" The mark is "just clever enough, being an obvious play on 'the pharmacy' and 'farm', so that the meaning or commercial impression of applicant's mark will be more than simply 'the pharmacy.'" Likening this case to one involving the mark "MufFuns" for muffins, the Board reversed the refusal.TTABlog comment: I find it interesting that the Board never mentioned its precedential ruling in the THE GREATEST BAR case, In re The Place,… [read post]