Search for: "Douglas v. State of Indiana"
Results 41 - 60
of 105
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2012, 12:35 pm
A proper reading of Jones v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 12:14 pm
IMS Health Inc., 131 S.Ct. 2653, 2659 (2011), and United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
Termination of "over-65" retired former county employees reemployed on a part-time basis did not violate the Age Discrimination in Employment ActCarson v Lake County, Indiana, USCA, 7th Circuit, No. 16-3665 Source: Article by Kathleen Kapusta, J.D. posted in Employment Law News from WK WorkDayAge was a necessary but insufficient factor in a county’s decision to terminate part-time rehired retirees who were 65 years old or older, the Seventh Circuit stated,… [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 10:00 am
The phrase was used in 1964 by United States Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart to describe his threshold test for obscenity in Jacobellis v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 10:37 am
State of Indiana (NFP) [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 10:01 pm
There are many state specific blogs related to family law topics, representing 38 states (and several foreign countries). [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 3:00 am
State, No. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 8:53 am
O' Hair Professor of Evidence & Procedure, Michigan State University School of Law. [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 9:20 pm
Indiana v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 2:00 am
Timm and Mary Kay Timm v. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 7:00 am
Douglas once did in the era of separationism. [read post]
1 May 2015, 10:00 am
Kim, that under United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 8:11 am
This McDonnell Douglas test, named for the case of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 6:02 am
The judgment was upheld on appeal in 2008, United States v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am
Indiana, 14-631. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Following a two and one-half week bench trial, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana found the '382 patent valid and infringed. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 12:15 am
Weinstein in United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:30 am
The Illinois Secretary of State Police; Elgin, Ill., Police Department; Seymour, Ind., Police Department; and Indiana State Police provided substantial assistance. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:30 am
The Illinois Secretary of State Police; Elgin, Ill., Police Department; Seymour, Ind., Police Department; and Indiana State Police provided substantial assistance. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:02 pm
United States and then again in the 1990 decision, Employment Div. v. [read post]
