Search for: "Duncan v. Judge" Results 41 - 60 of 471
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2023, 9:02 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
For example, a university taking and announcing a position on the (contested) issue of how easy it should be for foreign graduate students to obtain visas (something that distinctively affects the university itself—and not just its population—as an institution) seems very different to us than weighing in on the correctness of last year’s Second Amendment ruling by the Supreme Court ruling striking down New York’s public-carry law or the Court’s Dobbs ruling overturning… [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 4:47 pm by Richard Hunt
This sort of thing intrigues me, so I checked another case filed the same day, Brast v Columbian Cuisine, Case No. 4:23-cv-1339 (SD Tex). [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
National attention has recently been directed to the boisterous protest by Stanford Law School (SLS) students at a Federalist Society Event featuring Judge Kyle Duncan, a conservative Trump-appointed judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 11:32 am by Stuart N. Brotman
Perhaps Judge Duncan and his peers would be well advised to review Dean Martinez’s more generalized wisdom. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 4:33 am by Andrew Koppelman
As a judge, he nastily mocked a transgender litigant. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 9:08 am by Stephen Halbrook
-EV] The latest salvo in America's "assault-weapon" wars is the decision of February 17 by Judge Virginia Kendall of the Norther District of Illinois in Bevis v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 9:54 am by Josh Blackman
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court decided Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 4:25 am by jonathanturley
” Thirteen judges agreed with the conclusion though twelve (Chief Judge Richman and Judges Jones, Smith, Stewart, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, and Wilson) reversed on lenity grounds while eight members (Judges Jones, Smith, Elrod, Willett, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, and Wilson) reversed on the ground that federal law unambiguously fails to cover non-mechanical bump stocks. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 5:01 am by Stephen Halbrook
Judge Roger Benitez expressed skepticism about "experts" in a hearing on December 12 in Duncan v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am by David Kopel
" Finally, I read the Declaration of Robert Spitzer, which is Exhibit E of the California Attorney General's Supplemental Brief in Response to the Court's Order of September, 26, 2022, Duncan v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 12:26 pm by Josh Blackman
The majority opinion was written by Judge Jones, and was joined by Chief Judge Richman and Judges Smith, Stewart, Dennis, Southwick, Haynes, Costa, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, and Wilson. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
A v Cornwall Council [2017] EWHC 842 (QB). [read post]