Search for: "E. et al v. Education, Department of et al"
Results 41 - 60
of 184
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
DOWLING, JJ. 2019-09440 (Index No. 502489/14) [*1]Michelle Blackman, respondent, vMetropolitan Transit Authority, et al., defendants, New York City Transit Authority, et al., appellants. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
DOWLING, JJ. 2019-09440 (Index No. 502489/14) [*1]Michelle Blackman, respondent, vMetropolitan Transit Authority, et al., defendants, New York City Transit Authority, et al., appellants. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
DOWLING, JJ. 2019-09440 (Index No. 502489/14) [*1]Michelle Blackman, respondent, vMetropolitan Transit Authority, et al., defendants, New York City Transit Authority, et al., appellants. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
DOWLING, JJ. 2019-09440 (Index No. 502489/14) [*1]Michelle Blackman, respondent, vMetropolitan Transit Authority, et al., defendants, New York City Transit Authority, et al., appellants. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 8:57 am
Smith, Commissioner, Florida Department of Education, et al. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm
Oklahoma; Certificate of Appealability) In re Gold King Mine Release in San Juan County, Colorado, on August 5, 2015 (CERCLA; Natural Resource Damages) Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians, et al. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
• Most consumers know little about food irradiation (American Meat Institute, 1993; Bruhn, 2001) • A survey conducted at FoodNet sites in 1998-1999, indicated that the primary reason consumers would not buy irradiated foods (meat, poultry) was due to insufficient information about the risks and benefits; the survey also showed 50% of those asked were willing to buy irradiated meat and poultry and among those, 25% were willing to pay a premium price (Frenzen et… [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:03 pm
Rangel et al. 20054 reported that 41 percent of outbreaks were linked to beef and 21 percent to leafy vegetables. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 8:55 am
(See Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm
Petition for certiorari Brief in oppositionAmicus brief of United Retired Firefighters Association and The American Legion Department of CaliforniaAmicus brief of Foundation for Moral LawAmicus brief of American Center for Law and Justice et al.Amicus brief of Texas et al.Amicus brief of David EpsteinAmicus brief of Family Research Council et al.Amicus brief of Rear Admiral Jeremiah Denton, USN (Ret.) et al.Motion of Pacific Justice Institute to withdraw… [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 9:38 pm
Consolidated Edison Company of New York Inc et al (Docket Report) District Court C D California: For divided infringement, proof of agency not required to establish ‘direction and control’: Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 11:09 am
.'"] Two weeks ago, I blogged about Gary et al v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
http://j.st/SZM Life Partners, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
In the field portion of the boating study, the Maryland Department of Natural Resources Police administered the four SBST candidate measures. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 2:33 pm
LUNA DEVELOPMENTS GROUP, LLC, etc., et al., Appellees. 3rd District.The Law Lady. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm
Brief in opposition of respondents California Pharmacists Association et al. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 12:26 pm
Julia Angwin et al., Machine Bias, ProPublica (May 23, 2016). [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm
Decided and Entered:January 19, 2023 534648 [*1]In the Matter of Kenneth Puig, Appellant, vNew York State Police et al., Respondents. [read post]
