Search for: "EMI Music Publishing, Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 63
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2012, 9:10 pm by Ryan Singel
(HFA), Warner Chappell, UMPG Publishing and EMI Music Publishing, one or more of whom have blocked it in your country on copyright grounds. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:02 am
Travel Caddy, Inc (not precedential) (Gray On Claims) (PATracer) (Patently-O) Federal Court of Australia on copyright infringement of a musical work - ‘Down Under’ did infringe Kookaburra: Larrikin Music Publishing Pty Ltd v EMI Songs Australia Pty Limited (1709 Copyright Blog) (IP Whiteboard)   Global Global - General The 2010 inductees into the IP Hall of Fame are revealed (IAM) What really happened at the ACTA talks in Mexico (Michael… [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 4:10 pm
DRM-free music continues to march forward as EMI opens its catalog to use by other retailers. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 3:07 am
Not according to Good Old Games founders and Three Rings CEO (Techdirt) Government admits data mining for terrorists doesn't work (Techdirt) Delayed enforcement blocks domain name lawsuit: Southern Grouts v 3M (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Judge dismisses plaintiff's declaratory judgment claim regarding lawfulness of kooks.com based on lack of controversy: Global DNS v Kooks Custom Headers (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) Judge orders new trial, implores Congress to… [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan Australia Pty Limited (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) What happens when an opponent stops opposing: Delnorth Pty Ltd v Dura-Post (Aust) Pty Ltd (ipwars) Urgent interlocutory and declaratory relief: AED Oil Limited & Anor v Puffin FPSO Limited (ipwars) Infringement of copyright in musical works: a riff Down Under: Larrikin Music Publishing Pty Ltd v EMI Songs Australia Pty Limited (JIPLP)   Austria Austria: opposition possible… [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 4:00 am
Justice Michel Bastarache, of the Supreme Court of Canada, criticized that court for the 2004 decisions in the Monsanto Canada Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 1:49 pm
Video game publisher Electronic Arts has announced the creation of a full-service music label in a joint venture with Nettwerk One Music Ltd. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 3:13 pm by Kevin
Mainly because I can’t really tell who is in the proposed class: The Settlement Class is defined as: a) all Persons who, at any time since September 3, 1949, directly paid Defendants, Intervenors or their predecessors-in-interest (or either’s Affiliates) for each such Person’s use of the Song; (b) all Persons who, at any time since September 3, 1949, directly paid HFA, Alfred or Faber as agents for Defendants or their predecessors-in-interest for each such Person’s use… [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
(Afro-IP)   Australia Preliminary question: does applicant own copyright it is seeking to enforce: Larrikin Music Publishing Pty Ltd v EMI Songs Australia Pty Limited (LawFont)   Canada Canadian copyright collecting agency subverting open debate on copyright (Boing Boing) (Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) CMEC seeks review of K-12 Copyright Board tariff (Excess Copyright) The return of Captain Copyright? [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
(IP Tango)   South Africa Brand bullies: IP and the SMEs - difficulties faced by small companies in defending trade mark infringement claims (Afro-IP) Avoiding the ambush: FIFA World Cup (Afro-IP)   Switzerland JAVA MONSTER vulnerable and unprotected in Switzerland (Class 46)   Uganda Uganda’s Copyright Regulations finally published! [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
’: (IP finance), Allied Security Trust – High-tech companies pool resources to fight trolls: (IAM), (Techdirt), (Patent Prospector), (Ars Technica), (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property) Global - Copyright On distinguishing between creative commons, the public domain, and all rights reserved – confusion in mainstream media: (creativecommons.org), Inside views: a new business model for the music industry explained: (Intellectual Property Watch),… [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am by Kelly
(Class 46) United Kingdom EWCA: Unlicensed imprecision: Pink Floyd v EMI Records (1709 Blog) (IPKat) Just sue them! [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 7:08 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Second, the court says the willful blindness instruction was also broad: [s]ince we have held that contributory infringement requires knowledge of, or willful blindness to, specific instances of infringement, the court’s willful blindness instruction should similarly require a conclusion that Cox consciously avoid learning about specific instances of infringement, not merely that Cox avoided confirming the fact that ‘Cox users were infringing on BMG’s copyrights’ in… [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
, (Intellectual Property Watch), (Out-Law), (Electronic Frontier Foundation), The UK High Court allows computer program patent claims in Astron Clinica & Ors v The Comptroller: (IPKat), (BLOG@IP::JUR), (Filemot), (IAM), (The IP Factor), (IP Updates), (IMPACT), (IPcentral Weblog), (Out-Law), (IPBiz),Tarceva (Erlotinib) - Roche patent infringement action against CIPLA before Delhi High Court: Many posts at: (Spicy IP) and… [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]