Search for: "EX PARTE MARK SMITH " Results 41 - 60 of 313
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2023, 7:08 am by Dan Bressler
DeSantis, who mounted a presidential bid, has made his fight with Disney a key part of his political brand. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The report’s public release marks the latest chapter in the board of supervisors’ quest to tamp down conspiracy theories about elections in the county, which is home to more than half the state’s voters. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
California – Mark Ridley-Thomas Found Guilty in Corruption Case MSN – Matt Hamilton (Los Angeles Tim [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The new requirements mark a technical but significant change that lawmakers and transparency advocates hope will lead to more disclosure by judges and justices. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
California – Lawyers Make Opening Statements in Mark Ridley-Thomas Corruption Trial MSN – Matt Hamilton (Los Angeles Times) | Published: 3/8/2023 At the start of the corruption trial of suspended Los Angeles City Councilperson Mark Ridley-Thomas, jurors heard conflicting portraits of the onetime power broker. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Mark Meadows, a political ally and family friend, after Meadows chose not to seek reelection. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:59 am
In re Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, and Smith, Inc., 828 F.2d 1567, 1571, 4 U.S.P.Q.2d 1141, 1143 (Fed. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Katie Hobbs is seeking a review of what her office alleges was “likely unethical conduct” by the state’s former attorney general, Mark Brnovich. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Then-state Attorney General Mark Brnovich, a Republican who launched the probe, kept the findings private. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Santos has said he merely fabricated parts of his résumé and has denied breaking any laws. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm by Jim Sedor
Experts said they were struggling to interpret the change, especially because in filings from later in 2022, the box marking “personal funds of the candidate” remains checked. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 1:36 am by Jim Sedor
Mississippi and Alabama mark King-Lee Day as a state holiday. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 8:46 am by Zak Gowen
Thompson, 2021 ONSC 2206) and US text (Newberg and Rubenstein on Class Actions, 6th ed, 2022), and two articles that the Tribunal was not referred to by the parties (VR Johnson, ‘The Ethics of Communicating with Putative Class Members’, 17 Rev Litig 497 (1998); and DR Richmond, ‘Class Actions and Ex Parte Communications: Can We Talk’, 68 Mo L [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 8:04 am by Jim Sedor
Schenck was subpoenaed to testify as part of an effort by Democrats on the committee to strengthen ethics rules for justices, who are not bound by any code of conduct and are responsible for policing themselves. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Paul Smith of the Campaign Legal Center, which also defended the restrictions Cruz got overturned, drew a distinction between a senator taking donations that end up in his personal account and an ex-candidate tapping unspent campaign funds to repay an old loan. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
An analysis found almost 400 returns on the Lobbying Register in which ex-ministers, ministerial advisers, and secretaries general were not listed as what are known as former Designated Public Officials as required by law. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Capitol issued its subpoena of Donald Trump, demanding testimony from the former president who lawmakers say “personally orchestrated” a multi-part effort to overturn the results of the 2020 election. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 6:37 am by Eugene Volokh
Here's Part III (Part II is more doctrinal, so I'm skipping it for now, but you can read it in the PDF, if you'd like). [* * *] Weighing a person's religious community membership in deciding whether to let the person remain pseudonymous might thus not be unduly burdensome or unfair to litigation adversaries [in violation of the Establishment Clause]. [read post]