Search for: "Egan v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 64
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2014, 7:38 pm
CVSG United States ex rel. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 6:52 am
United States is whether the Sarbanes-Oxley Act’s ban on destroying a “tangible object” includes only materials like documents or other records, or also includes a physical object like a fish. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
Egan, Coordinator CH.A.D.D. of East Aurora Phone: (716) 655-0537 Long Island Joan B. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 8:02 am
United States (Al-Bahlul II), which upheld the petitioner’s conviction for conspiracy. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 5:03 pm
United States is such a painful example of customs litigation, that I have started and deleted draft posts a number of time. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
Initially, this was done by reference to Article 8 of the Convention (see Gaskin v United Kingdom (1989) 12 EHRR 36 paras 37, 52; see also McGinley and Egan v United Kingdom (1998) 27 EHRR 1). [read post]
Freedom of Expression and Freedom of Information: Part 1 The European Convention – Hugh Tomlinson QC
4 May 2010, 5:38 pm
In some cases this has been done by reference to Article 8 of the Convention (see Gaskin v United Kingdom (1989) 12 EHRR 36 paras 37, 52; see also McGinley and Egan v United Kingdom (1998) 27 EHRR 1). [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 6:17 pm
But he nevertheless identified a number of situations in which a party would have standing to attack the FAA: for example, if the government chose to use FAA-derived information in a judicial or administrative proceeding (as occurred in United States v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 4:47 pm
The Supreme Court has stated in Department of the Navy v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 3:56 am
That's what Shelby County Circuit Judge Hub Harrington found in Burdette v. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 10:36 am
United States, 334 U.S. 742, 767 n.9 (1948) (citation omitted), as well as the Supreme Court’s directive in Boumediene that “[i]n considering both the procedural and substantive standards used to impose detention to prevent acts of terrorism, proper deference must be accorded to the political branches,” 128 S.Ct. at 2276 (2008) (citing United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 10:31 am
However, after certification of a bargaining unit and a union – the contractual nature fails since “…it is [not] possible to speak of individual contracts of employment and to treat the collective agreement as a mere appendage of individual relationships. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 6:52 am
Charles Dickens did this, but his heavy schedule of public performances in the United States, where his works were not protected by copyright, arguably contributed to his untimely death.Dickens visited the United States twice. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 11:01 am
Unless the United States can convince a partner nation that their information can be adequately protected, they may be dissuaded from sharing it, thus placing the United States and its citizens at increased risk. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:26 am
” The next day, the employee posted disparaging remarks about the superior stating: “You embarrass me, our country, and our unit!!! [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 6:02 am
” As the Supreme Court stated in Department of the Navy v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
: the failure of safe drinking waterenforcement in the United States. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 11:19 am
United States Bank Nat. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:19 pm
See Egan v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:36 am
Recent developments in Texas, United States, and international energy law. 6 Tex. [read post]
