Search for: "Eisenberg v State of New York" Results 41 - 60 of 61
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2009, 11:37 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
Check out this case:It basically states that unless your lender actually signs your loan modification agreement then YOU DON'T HAVE A LOAN MODIFICATION.Has anyone actually gotten a signed loan modification? [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 8:57 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Part I examines the legal framework governing arbitration in the United States, including New York Convention and Federal Arbitration Act. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Eisenberg, 60 AD3d 77 (1st Dept 2009), and the seminal New York case on the subject of the demand requirement, Marx v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Eisenberg, 60 AD3d 77 (1st Dept 2009), and the seminal New York case on the subject of the demand requirement, Marx v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)In 2010, the faculty at Penn State Law approved the creation of a new concept course, to be named "Elements of Law". [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
That balance is remarkably reflected in the August 16, 2017 decision in Weisberger v. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
That balance is remarkably reflected in the August 16, 2017 decision in Weisberger v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
Shortly before the New Year, a New York Times story based on newly reported emails and communications suggested that the officials who know the most about the withheld aid to Ukraine—former National Security Adviser John Bolton; Acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney; Office of Management and Budget officials Robert Blair, Michael Duffey and Russell Vought; and White House lawyers—are the same officials who, at President Trump’s direction, have… [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm by Law Lady
Under New York law, the no-action clause of a trust indenture barred noteholders' suit alleging that the corporation's issuance of a dividend and planned spin off a business were fraudulent transfers. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:00 am by Steve Lombardi
“Legislatures in seven other states — Illinois, Indiana, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New York and Utah— have considered laws that would enhance penalties against those who secretly record video of livestock, though the efforts have stalled in some states. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:31 am by Jack Sharman
Michael Landon (“Little Joe Cartwright”) being served with a subpoena (1968) Another useful Townsend post addresses a common issue — the Government’s attempt to muzzle the recipients of subpoenas: In United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am by Norman L. Eisen
Expand all Collapse all Relevant Court Proceedings United States v. [read post]