Search for: "Elizabeth Feldman" Results 41 - 60 of 117
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2018, 2:30 pm by David Lat
Adam Feldman confirms that it's not your imagination. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Editor’s Note: This is the third in a series of columns introducing a subject that will be ongoing.For weeks now, I have been reading studies examining Trump’s base, those core supporters who are with him notwithstanding his conspicuous incompetence as President of the United States, and the resulting chaos his lack of leadership has created. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 3:33 am by Edith Roberts
At the Heritage Foundation’s SCOTUS 101 podcast, Elizabeth Slattery and Tiffany Bates “preview cases coming up at SCOTUS this spring: free speech, internet sales tax, administrative law judges, and more. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman tries to measure the impact of the litigants on case outcomes by “tak[ing] a basic look at the relative amount of law shared between Court opinions and the parties’ merits briefs. [read post]
3 Feb 2018, 5:10 am by William Ford
Waxman posted the full text of his review of Noah Feldman’s “The Three Lives of James Madison. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 7:14 am by Andrew Hamm
In the latest episode of the Heritage Foundation’s SCOTUS 101 podcast, Elizabeth Slattery and Tiffany Bates talk with Adam Feldman, the founder of Empirical SCOTUS, and play “Judge or Just Made Up” – “can you spot the fake judges? [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 7:41 am by Brooke
  In The Washington Post is a review of Noah Feldman's The Three Lives of James Madison: Genius, Partisan, President. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman examines evidence suggesting that Judge Brett Kavanaugh of the U.S. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
Kara Goad and Elizabeth Sullivan preview the case for Cornell. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
” Commentary comes from Rick Hasen in an op-ed for The Los Angeles Times and Noah Feldman at Bloomberg View. [read post]
9 May 2017, 3:33 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed at CNN, Elizabeth Wydra remarks on recent rumors that Justice Anthony Kennedy may be contemplating retirement, warning that “any nominee to replace Justice Kennedy would be intent on demolishing the key pillars of his legacy. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
 Kara Goad and Elizabeth Sullivan provide a preview for Cornell University Law School’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:29 pm by Andrew Hamm
Early commentary comes from Noah Feldman of Bloomberg View. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 6:30 am by Jane Chong
Some commentators have not clearly distinguished Trump’s authority to restrict federal funds from Congress’s authority to do so, instead conflating the two under the “federal government” umbrella (see Noah Feldman’s argument for the order’s unconstitutionality and David Rivkin and Elizabeth Price Foley’s argument to the contrary). [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 4:40 am by Edith Roberts
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman looks at the court’s diminishing caseload, observing that without “a specific impetus, the Justices are unlikely to take on more cases annually,” and that although the justices spend a fair amount of time reviewing cert petitions, “a lingering question will continue to be how the Justices have reallocated their time as the Court’s caseload has decreased. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
Kara Goad and Elizabeth Sullivan provide a preview for Cornell University Law School’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Feldman of the American Petroleum Institute reportedly cautioned EPA that “[moving] forward with these guidelines without robust data could impose unachievable emission reduction requirements on the industry. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:13 am by Amy Howe
”  In The Daily Signal, Elizabeth Slattery and Jana Minich counter that guarding “the integrity of the court should be a higher priority for all the justices than grabbing headlines or expressing their opinions on matters that ultimately may come before the court. [read post]