Search for: "English v. Jacobs"
Results 41 - 60
of 265
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2013, 2:15 am
There have been times when it appeared that Lord Justice Jacob was its only proponent. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Regner and Jacob Dougherty (Debevoise & Plimpton LLP), on Saturday, February 10, 2024 Tags: Controller, delaware, Delaware Supreme Court, Kahn v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Regner and Jacob Dougherty (Debevoise & Plimpton LLP), on Saturday, February 10, 2024 Tags: Controller, delaware, Delaware Supreme Court, Kahn v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 6:34 am
The event was under Chatham House rules but included Sir Robin Jacob (UCL) and Richard Vary (Bird& Bird) (neither of whom are terribly shy about expressing their views!). [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 5:49 am
It was most likely some classic tort or contract case (see Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Bomb or Caparo v Dickman). [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 3:14 am
Yesterday’s oral argument in Elonis v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 11:14 pm
Sir Robin stated that this argument is listened to more by Continental judges than by English ones, which is worrying. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:30 am
This Kat blogged last year about the masterful and erudite judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in the case of Actavis v Lilly (judgment on BAILII here), concerning pemetrexed. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 4:14 am
In DHL Project & Chartering Ltd v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:22 am
Rowling's Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire brought by the estate of the author of The Adventures of Willy the Wizard--No 1 Livid Land, Courthouse News Service reports.In tossing the 13-page complaint in Paul Gregory Allen, Trustee of the Estate of Adrian Jacobs v. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 4:22 am
Mr Justice Nugee heard the application and what follows is taken from the transcript.He was keen from the outset to inspect the physical samples of the products, confirming the approach to registered design cases advocated by Sir Robin Jacob in Dyson v Vax:“What really matters is what the court can see with its own eyes. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 3:36 pm
Did Unwired Planet need to first comply with the Huawei v ZTE steps? [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 8:31 am
He cannot.The case is Graves v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:09 am
The first question – about the English copyright – was the more important for Mr Ainsworth. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 9:34 pm
BBC Worldwide Ltd v Bee Load Ltd (t/a Archangel Ltd) [2007] EWHC 134 (Comm), a Commercial Court decision of Lord Justice Toulson a couple of weeks ago, on 8 February 2007, was not going to get a mention on this weblog. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:06 am
Yesterday’s argument in Yates v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:36 am
H v L, [2017] EWHC 137 (Comm) H v L, [2017] EWHC 137 (Comm), also demonstrates potentially important differences between New York and English law. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:36 am
H v L, [2017] EWHC 137 (Comm) H v L, [2017] EWHC 137 (Comm), also demonstrates potentially important differences between New York and English law. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 2:50 am
In April of this year Mr Justice Floyd gave judgment in Football Dataco & others v Brittens Pools and others [2010] EWHC 841 (Ch). [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
W Limited v. [read post]
