Search for: "Epic Technologies, LLC"
Results 41 - 60
of 86
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2017, 4:54 am
H/T Jim Tyre Copyright © 2007-2017 Simple Justice NY, LLC This feed is for personal, non-commercial and Newstex use only. [read post]
30 May 2017, 10:33 pm
BREAKING: Supreme Court limits US patentee's forum shopping capabilities Annsley Merelle Ward breaks the news on the judgement TC Heartland LLC v Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC (2017), where it was held that the provisions on the definition of residence of a defendant have to be interpreted narrowly, as place of residence refers to the State of incorporation.Shinder, Shinder, Shinder … will you ever be like Tinder? [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 am
Post Grant Admin: SightSound Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 5:44 pm
Microsoft Corp., No. 16-859 (evidence necessary for finding an abstract idea) Post Grant Admin: SightSound Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am
It brought with it what will one day be recognized, along with self-driving cars, drone snack delivery, and the clip-on man bun, as one of the defining technological breakthroughs of the 21st century: Relist Watch SelectTM. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:47 am
”—In Vizant Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:47 am
”—In Vizant Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:16 am
Epic Pharma, LLC, 16-289 (whether the circumstances of invention can help prove non-obviousness) (The Purdue and Grunenthal cases stem from the same Federal Circuit decision but involve separate patents owned by the respective petitioners) Claim Construction: CSP Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 6:50 am
Claim Construction: CSP Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 8:39 am
Epic Pharma, LLC, 16-289 (whether the circumstances of invention can help prove non-obviousness) (The Purdue and Grunenthal cases stem from the same Federal Circuit decision but involve separate patents owned by the respective petitioners) Obviousness: MacDermid Printing Solutions, LLC v. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 6:03 pm
Claim Construction: CSP Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 10:43 am
’” Greenliant Sys., Inc. v.Xicor LLC, 692 F.3d 1261, 1268 (Fed. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 3:27 am
But this has given rise to an epic twitter shitstorm, implicating the new cry of censorship. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 8:52 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Kent Recycling Services, LLC v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 5:30 am
Roy v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 4:18 am
Copyright © 2013 Simple Justice NY, LLC This feed is for personal, non-commercial and Newstex use only. [read post]
12 May 2013, 5:30 am
http://t.co/9jDhrh5Fra -> Bell must justify Astral takeover, CRTC says http://t.co/cSpwqtFg6K -> Anton Pillar orders reviewed in XY, LLC v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:04 am
(“Epic”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Epic Media Group, LLC. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 8:26 pm
Laboratories, Inc.; Purdue Pharmaceuticals L.P.; Rhodes Technologies • Defendant: Epic Pharma, LLC Purdue Pharma L.P. et al. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 9:00 am
We'll be watching as these cases develop, particularly in light of the Supreme Court's recent decision in Nitro-Lift Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
