Search for: "Epstein v. State of Illinois"
Results 41 - 53
of 53
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2011, 12:25 pm
Distribution v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:55 am
Epstein is wrong on first-to-file (IPBiz) To Arms! [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:07 pm
Among other things, it explains why the mandate runs afoul of the five part test established in the Supreme Court’s most recent Necessary and Proper Clause decision, United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
“From the beginning of his time as a Justice, you could see Stevens’s roots in the New Deal Court and his willingness to justify an expanding welfare state,” Richard Epstein, a libertarian-leaning law professor at New York University, said. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
“From the beginning of his time as a Justice, you could see Stevens’s roots in the New Deal Court and his willingness to justify an expanding welfare state,” Richard Epstein, a libertarian-leaning law professor at New York University, said. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 1:41 pm
Practicing … Benchmarks » Blog Archive » Toxic tort claim against dry cleaner … Toxic Tort :: Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Epstein (Chicago), Neal K. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 7:02 am
United States and Black v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 12:44 pm
The Illinois Supreme Court held that the regulation was a tax, and not subject to takings analysis.The Mountain States Legal Foundation's brief argues the Court should review the case to resolve the confusion created by Eastern Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 5:23 am
Royall also suing is the book's publisher, Encounter Books, and Richard Epstein of Illinois, who contributed a summary of the book on its dust jacket. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 11:29 pm
(3/6/07)Epstein on FDA drug preemption (3/4/07)Implied warranty - Pennsylvania has a better idea (3/1/07)Williams v. [read post]
