Search for: "Ervin W. Ervin"
Results 41 - 51
of 51
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2012, 2:48 pm
Ervin, 241 N.J.Super. 458 (App. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 1:05 am
Federal Courthouse
Daily Business Review
Florida plaintiffs attorney Ervin Gonzalez says he will begin investigating environmental conditions at the David W. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 11:21 am
March 19/23 James W. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 6:20 am
Group W Productions, Inc. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 8:47 am
This post summarizes criminal decisions released by the Supreme Court of North Carolina on June 11, 2021. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable onVoting Rights, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022.Sanford Levinson First I must express my continued thanks to the persons actually behind this remarkable project, Richard Albert, Ashley Moran, and Trish Do. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am
Frank Bowman recently published an essay in Lawfare that criticized arguments I made in an essay on the site. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 5:24 am
Prugh, James W. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 8:34 am
The court explained that to conclude otherwise, “[w]e would be required to hold that the State’s evidence that defendant killed his grandfather as part of a continuous transaction in which he also attempted to murder his mother using his hands and arms as a deadly weapon was so sufficiently strong that no reasonable possibility exists under which the jury would have done anything other than convict defendant of first-degree murder on the basis of that legal theory. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
ITERATIVE DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM Basic propositional logic teaches that the disjunctive syllogism (modus tollendo ponens) is a valid argument, in which one of its premises is a disjunction (P v Q), and the other premise is the negation of one of the disjuncts: P v Q ~P_____ ∴ Q See Irving Copi & Carl Cohen Introduction to Logic at 362 (2005). [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
It comes as no surprise that the Supreme Court of Georgia rejected constitutional challenges to the Daubert rule on expert testimony in the newly released decision of Mason v. [read post]