Search for: "Estate of Burke v. Burke" Results 41 - 60 of 106
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2015, 5:31 pm by Colin O'Keefe
In an interesting trend, grad students are pushing for employee status—Cary Burke has the latest story on that front. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:11 am
Burke Real Estate Management, LLC ("The defendant JRS Investments, LLC (JRS), a junior lienholder,  appeals from the judgment of the trial court approving the foreclosure by sale of a six unit apartment building. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 1:48 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Justice Burke asked whether there was a rational basis for imposing a charge for recording real estate documents to fund a housing program. [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 10:41 pm
In Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone and Matter of Vitole, Matter of Phelan, it was held that the court bears the ultimate responsibility for approving legal fees that are charged to an estate and has the discretion to determine what constitutes reasonable compensation for legal services rendered in the course of the administration of an estate. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 10:42 pm
In Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone and Matter of Vitole, Matter of Phelan, it was held that the court bears the ultimate responsibility for approving legal fees that are charged to an estate and has the discretion to determine what constitutes reasonable compensation for legal services rendered in the course of the administration of an estate. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 10:45 pm
In Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone and Matter of Vitole, Matter of Phelan, it was held that the court bears the ultimate responsibility for approving legal fees that are charged to an estate and has the discretion to determine what constitutes reasonable compensation for legal services rendered in the course of the administration of an estate. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 10:52 pm
In Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone and Matter of Vitole, Matter of Phelan, it was held that the court bears the ultimate responsibility for approving legal fees that are charged to an estate and has the discretion to determine what constitutes reasonable compensation for legal services rendered in the course of the administration of an estate. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 10:46 pm
A Staten Island Probate Lawyer said in Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone and Matter of Vitole, Matter of Phelan, it was held that the court bears the ultimate responsibility for approving legal fees that are charged to an estate and has the discretion to determine what constitutes reasonable compensation for legal services rendered in the course of the administration of an estate. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 10:42 pm
In Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone and Matter of Vitole, Matter of Phelan, it was held that the court bears the ultimate responsibility for approving legal fees that are charged to an estate and has the discretion to determine what constitutes reasonable compensation for legal services rendered in the course of the administration of an estate. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 4:44 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 Justice Burke suggested that the Court had previously found a fiduciary duty to next of kin in DeLuna v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 9:00 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Our reports on the oral arguments of the recent term of the Illinois Supreme Court continue with Home Star Bank & Financial Services v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 3:59 am by Terry Hart
The Supreme Court a few weeks ago agreed to review the Second Circuit’s decision in ABC v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Union Can Offer Gift Card to Entice Employees to Strike, says NLRB’s GC – Columbus lawyer Nelson Cary of Vorys on the firm’s blog, Vorys on Labor Leasing Trends in 2013 – Cincinnati lawyer Scott Kadish of Ulmer Berne on the firm’s Real Estate Advisor Law Blog  SEC CustodyFest Vol. 2: Electric Boogaloo – Raleigh attorney David Smyth of Brooks Pierce on their blog, Cady Bar the Door TCPA, Preemption, and the First Amendment:… [read post]
24 May 2013, 12:51 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 She contrasted the decision with the Third District's decision in Keller v. [read post]